16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LOREN T. STUCKENBRUCK 117<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong> metaphorical usage of blindness <strong>and</strong> going astray in relation to<br />

<strong>the</strong> wicked does not occur in <strong>the</strong> book of Daniel at all. 45 Along <strong>the</strong>se<br />

lines, it is perhaps significant that <strong>the</strong> combination of <strong>the</strong>se metaphors is<br />

found in <strong>the</strong> Animal Apocalypse (1 En. 89:32–33, 54), <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> vision goes<br />

on to refer to <strong>the</strong> “dim-sightedness” or “blindness” of <strong>the</strong> unfaithful<br />

Israelite “sheep” (e.g., 1 En. 89:74; 90:7, 26).<br />

<strong>The</strong>se considerations suggest that 4Q245, similar to <strong>the</strong> 4Q243–244<br />

fragments discussed above, preserves elements found in both Danielic<br />

<strong>and</strong> Enochic traditions. This signifies ei<strong>the</strong>r a dependence in 4Q245 on<br />

one or both literary collections, or reflects an early stage of tradition in<br />

which <strong>the</strong> tradition-historical boundaries between <strong>the</strong> earlier apocalyptic<br />

traditions are still fluid.<br />

4QAramaic Apocalypse or “Son of God Text” (4Q246)<br />

This manuscript, which consists of fragmentary portions in early<br />

Herodian script from two columns, was one of <strong>the</strong> most discussed texts<br />

before its official publication by Puech in 1996. 46 <strong>The</strong> reason for this<br />

interest is <strong>the</strong> text’s reference to a figure designated “Son of God” <strong>and</strong><br />

“Son of <strong>the</strong> Most High” (2.1) <strong>and</strong> its possible significance as background<br />

for Christology as preserved in Luke 1:32 <strong>and</strong> 35. Despite <strong>the</strong> fact that<br />

<strong>the</strong>re has been little unanimity concerning <strong>the</strong> identity of this figure—<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> text refers to a “messianic” character or is an allusion to one<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Seleucid rulers—<strong>the</strong>re is wide agreement that 4Q246 is dependent<br />

45. Blindness ((wr): Deut 27:18; 28:28–29; Isa 59:10; Zeph 1:17; Lam 4:14<br />

(“Pseudo-Daniel Revisited,” 148); going astray (t(h; srr): Ps 58:4 (3 ET); 119:176;<br />

Prov 7:25; Isa 53:6; Ezek 14:11; 44:10, 15; 48:11; Hos 4:16. Among <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong><br />

texts, <strong>the</strong> Damascus Document includes both motifs: cf. CD 1.9, 14–15 (par. 4Q266 col.<br />

1); 2.6, 13, 16 (par. 4Q266 col. 2); 3.1, 4, 14; <strong>and</strong> 4.1; in none of <strong>the</strong>se references are<br />

<strong>the</strong> metaphors directly linked with one ano<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

46. Émile Puech, “4QApocryphe de Daniel ar,” in Qumran Cave 4.XVII: Parabiblical<br />

Texts, Part 3 (ed. G. J. Brooke et al.; DJD 22; Oxford: Clarendon, 1996), 165–84; in<br />

addition to Puech’s bibliography on 165n1, see Florentino García Martínez, “<strong>The</strong><br />

Eschatological Figure of 4Q246,” in Qumran <strong>and</strong> Apocalyptic, 162–79; John J. Collins, <strong>The</strong><br />

Scepter <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Star: <strong>The</strong> Messiahs of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong> <strong>and</strong> O<strong>the</strong>r Ancient Literature (ABRL;<br />

Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1995), 154–72; Craig A. Evans, “Jesus <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong><br />

<strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong> from Qumram Cave 4,” in Eschatology, Messianism, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong> (ed.<br />

C. A. Evans <strong>and</strong> P. W. Flint; SDSSRL; Gr<strong>and</strong> Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997), 91–100, esp.<br />

92–94; Beyer, ATTM Ergänzungsb<strong>and</strong>, 145–49; <strong>and</strong> James D. G. Dunn, “‘Son of God’<br />

as ‘Son of Man’ in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong>?” in <strong>The</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Scriptures: Qumran Fifty<br />

Years After (ed. S. E. Porter <strong>and</strong> C. A. Evans; JSPSup 26; Roehampton Institute<br />

London Papers 3; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1997), 198–210.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!