16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JÖRG FREY 425<br />

put forward <strong>the</strong> view that <strong>the</strong>re was a coherent “Zadokite” movement that<br />

included Ezra, Judas Maccabaeus, John <strong>the</strong> Baptist, Jesus, <strong>and</strong> his bro<strong>the</strong>r<br />

James. So, Jesus with his followers <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Qumran group are regarded as<br />

parts of that movement, which is also identified with Zealotism, <strong>the</strong> Jewish<br />

protest against Rome. Eisenman’s starting point is <strong>the</strong> superficial similarity<br />

between <strong>the</strong> designation “Righteous Teacher” <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> later epi<strong>the</strong>t for<br />

“James <strong>the</strong> Just.” <strong>The</strong> similarity between both leads Eisenman to <strong>the</strong> identification<br />

of both figures. So, he interprets 1QpHab 11.4–8 as a comment<br />

on <strong>the</strong> persecution of “James <strong>the</strong> Just” by <strong>the</strong> high priest Ananus II, as<br />

reported in Josephus (Ant. 20.200–203). Consequently, he identifies <strong>the</strong><br />

“Liar,” ano<strong>the</strong>r figure mentioned in <strong>the</strong> Qumran texts as opposed to <strong>the</strong><br />

Righteous Teacher <strong>and</strong> his group, with Paul <strong>the</strong> apostle. So he sees <strong>the</strong><br />

Qumran documents as mirroring Jewish-Christian-Zealot polemic against<br />

Paul, whom he views not only as an apostate from Judaism but also as an<br />

agent of <strong>the</strong> Romans. This quite fantastic <strong>the</strong>ory is based on <strong>the</strong> assumption<br />

that <strong>the</strong> authors of <strong>the</strong> Qumran texts used a peculiar method of wordplay<br />

to conceal <strong>the</strong> historical events behind allusions so that <strong>the</strong> modern<br />

interpreter has to use his or her speculative fantasy in order to detect <strong>the</strong><br />

real meaning behind <strong>the</strong> words. 65<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> even more fantastic model was developed by <strong>the</strong><br />

Australian Qumran scholar <strong>and</strong> novelist Barbara Thiering. Like<br />

Eisenman, she defends a late Herodian date of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong>, 66 but<br />

identifies <strong>the</strong> Righteous Teacher with John <strong>the</strong> Baptist, whereas <strong>the</strong><br />

“Wicked Priest” <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> “Liar” (who are most probably two different figures<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Qumran texts) can be nobody else than Jesus himself. <strong>The</strong><br />

result is a bizarre novel of <strong>the</strong> “new” life of Jesus, from his birth near<br />

Qumran, his education by <strong>the</strong> Essenes, <strong>and</strong> his initiation into <strong>the</strong><br />

Qumran community by John <strong>the</strong> Baptist—until his marriages with Mary<br />

of Magdala <strong>and</strong>, later, with Lydia of Philippi, <strong>and</strong> his journey to Rome,<br />

Literary Studies. (ed. Z. J. Kapera; Proceedings of <strong>the</strong> Second International Colloquium<br />

on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong> [Mogilany, Pol<strong>and</strong>, 1989]; Qumranica Mogilanensia 3;<br />

Kraków: Enigma, 1991), 177–96; idem, “<strong>The</strong>ory of Judeo-Christian Origins: <strong>The</strong> Last<br />

Column of <strong>the</strong> Damascus Document,” in Methods of Investigation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Khirbet Qumran Site: Present Realities <strong>and</strong> Future Prospects (ed. M. O. Wise et al.; New<br />

York: Academy of Sciences, 1994), 355–70; idem, James <strong>the</strong> Bro<strong>the</strong>r of Jesus: <strong>The</strong> Key to<br />

Unlocking <strong>the</strong> Secrets of Early Christianity <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong> (New York: Viking, 1996).<br />

65. Cf. Eisenman, “Playing On <strong>and</strong> Transmuting Words.” See <strong>the</strong> critical assessment<br />

of <strong>the</strong> method in Betz <strong>and</strong> Riesner, Jesus, Qumran und der Vatikan, 97–98; cf.<br />

88–102, with an extensive criticism of Eisenman’s constructions.<br />

66. Cf. Barbara E. Thiering’s early study Redating <strong>the</strong> Teacher of Righteousness (Sydney:<br />

<strong>The</strong>ological Explorations, 1979). She develops her full story in Jesus <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Riddle of<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong>: Unlocking <strong>the</strong> Secrets of His Life Story (San Francisco: Harper Collins,<br />

1992). Cf. <strong>the</strong> criticism in Betz <strong>and</strong> Riesner, ibid., 121–38.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!