16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

192 THE TWO SPIRITS IN QUMRAN THEOLOGY<br />

of 1QM an interpretation of an entirely different sort, <strong>the</strong> creation tradition,<br />

with a certain deterministic stamp, which it obtained in <strong>the</strong> Qumran<br />

community.” 55 This emphasis upon creation is due to <strong>the</strong> influence of <strong>the</strong><br />

Qumran Hymns; Osten-Sacken, like H.-W. Kuhn, observed, for example,<br />

<strong>the</strong> similarity between 1QH 15.21–22—”You have fashioned <strong>the</strong> spirit<br />

<strong>and</strong> have organized its task”—<strong>and</strong> 1QS 3.16—”when <strong>the</strong>y come into existence<br />

in <strong>the</strong>ir fixed times <strong>the</strong>y carry through <strong>the</strong>ir task according to his<br />

glorious design.” 56 In addition to <strong>the</strong> assimilation of an emphasis upon<br />

creation, <strong>the</strong> editor has also added a predestinarian thread in 1QS<br />

3.17–19, probably, according to Osten-Sacken, due to Iranian<br />

(Zoroastrian) influence in a period subsequent to <strong>the</strong> writing of <strong>the</strong> War<br />

Scroll. <strong>The</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong> original eschatological dualism of <strong>the</strong> War Scroll<br />

which provides <strong>the</strong> ground structure of 1QS 3.13–4.14 diminished <strong>and</strong><br />

was supplemented by a new emphasis upon creation, <strong>the</strong> ethical contrast<br />

of good <strong>and</strong> evil in <strong>the</strong> present, <strong>and</strong> predestination.<br />

If 1QS 3.13–4.14 represents an intermediate stage in <strong>the</strong> development<br />

of Qumran dualism, <strong>the</strong>n 1QS 4.15–26 comprises a still later phase. In<br />

this section <strong>the</strong> anthropological struggle comes to <strong>the</strong> fore. <strong>The</strong> battle<br />

lines had shifted from <strong>the</strong> opposition between Israel <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> nations<br />

(1QM) to <strong>the</strong> contrast between <strong>the</strong> sons of light <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> sons of darkness,<br />

including Jews (1QS 3.13–4.14), to <strong>the</strong> individual’s struggle between<br />

righteousness <strong>and</strong> evil (1QS 4.15–26).<br />

According to Osten-Sacken, <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong>re are no less than three stages of<br />

Qumran thought reflected in 1QS 3.13–4.26. 1QS 3.20–25 reflects most<br />

clearly <strong>the</strong> dualistic origins of Qumran thought akin to <strong>the</strong> War Scroll.<br />

1QS 3.13–4.14 adjusts that dualism for present experience by associating<br />

it with creation <strong>and</strong> predestination. <strong>The</strong> anthropological emphasis of 1QS<br />

4.15–26 represents a fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> subsequent ethicizing of this dualism.<br />

Syn<strong>the</strong>sis<br />

<strong>The</strong> fissure created by Betz’s study was developed in <strong>the</strong> studies of H.-W.<br />

Kuhn <strong>and</strong> Osten-Sacken into an irreparable fracture. All subsequent studies<br />

have been compelled to acknowledge that in <strong>the</strong> Qumran writings as<br />

a whole (Betz), <strong>the</strong> Qumran Hymns (Kuhn), <strong>and</strong> 1QS 3–4 (Osten-<br />

Sacken) multiple conceptions of God’s spirit(s) were permitted to coexist.<br />

55. von der Osten-Sacken, Gott und Belial, 130.<br />

56. Ibid., 129.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!