16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GABRIELE BOCCACCINI 47<br />

salvation of <strong>the</strong> chosen people. Hence, Jubilees insists on people following<br />

<strong>the</strong> ritual laws with <strong>the</strong> utmost accuracy <strong>and</strong> respecting <strong>the</strong> liturgical times<br />

that God has established since <strong>the</strong> beginning of creation (6:32–35).<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> harshest words are reserved for Jews who risk <strong>the</strong> purity<br />

of Israel (30:7–17), <strong>the</strong> separation that Jubilees promotes is essentially<br />

between Jews <strong>and</strong> Gentiles (22:16), <strong>and</strong> not properly within <strong>the</strong> Jewish<br />

people <strong>the</strong>mselves. Jubilees does not use <strong>the</strong> language of <strong>the</strong> remnant. No<br />

special group appears on <strong>the</strong> scene as <strong>the</strong> recipient of divine instruction.<br />

Jubilees claims to represent <strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong> Jews against a minority of<br />

traitors in a time that in its view was <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> eschaton. <strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ology of separation in Jubilees is not <strong>the</strong> last recourse of people<br />

devoured by a minority complex, who feel persecuted <strong>and</strong> isolated <strong>and</strong><br />

struggle to defend <strong>the</strong>mselves. On <strong>the</strong> contrary, it betrays a majority complex<br />

of people who were confident that <strong>the</strong>ir time was <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> conversion<br />

of Israel, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong>ir hopes would soon be fulfilled. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

expected to see <strong>the</strong> deviants persecuted <strong>and</strong> rejected. <strong>The</strong> audience of<br />

Jubilees is evidently to be found among <strong>the</strong> nation as a whole <strong>and</strong> not<br />

among an embattled sectarian community. 24<br />

Following <strong>the</strong> same trajectory, <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll transposed Jubilees’ <strong>the</strong>ology<br />

of separation into a detailed <strong>and</strong> consistent constitution for <strong>the</strong> present,<br />

<strong>the</strong> final days of Israel in this world before <strong>the</strong> end of days <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

world to come. 25 This constitution provides <strong>the</strong> plan for an interim<br />

Temple (11QT a [11Q19] 29.2–10), not envisaged in Jubilees, as well as a<br />

new, stricter code of purity laws, which with greater accuracy meets <strong>the</strong><br />

requirements set by Jubilees. <strong>The</strong> basic principle is that <strong>the</strong> Temple-city is<br />

equivalent to <strong>the</strong> camp of Israel in <strong>the</strong> wilderness, <strong>and</strong> correspondingly,<br />

<strong>the</strong> biblical laws concerning <strong>the</strong> purity of <strong>the</strong> Sinai encampment (Leviticus<br />

13; Numbers 5; Deuteronomy 23) are strictly applied to Jerusalem (cf.<br />

11QT a [11Q19] 47.3–6). 26 <strong>The</strong> requirements of purity for <strong>the</strong> Temple are<br />

extended to <strong>the</strong> whole city of Jerusalem (cf. Lev 15:18 <strong>and</strong> 11QT a<br />

[11Q19] 45.11–12), <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> requirements of purity for <strong>the</strong> priests to <strong>the</strong><br />

entire people of Israel (cf. Lev 21:17–20 <strong>and</strong> 11QT a [11Q19] 45.12–13).<br />

Jubilees <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll transform <strong>the</strong> oppositional ideology of <strong>the</strong><br />

earlier Enochic literature into a platform for a new government of Israel.<br />

24. Orval S. Wintermute, “Jubilees,” in OTP 2:44, 48; Philip R. Davies, Behind <strong>the</strong><br />

Essenes: History <strong>and</strong> Ideology in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong> (BJS 94; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1987), 117.<br />

25. Michael O. Wise, A Critical Study of <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll from Qumran Cave 11 (SAOC<br />

49; Chicago: Oriental Institute, 1990).<br />

26. Jacob Milgrom, “<strong>The</strong> Qumran Cult: Its Exegetical Principles,” in Temple Scroll Studies<br />

Presented at <strong>the</strong> International Symposium on <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll, Manchester, December 1987 (ed. G. J.<br />

Brooke; JSPSup 7; Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1989), 165—80; Lawrence H. Schiffman,<br />

“Exclusion from <strong>the</strong> Sanctuary <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> City of <strong>the</strong> Sanctuary,” HAR 9 (1985): 315–17.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!