16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SHEMARYAHU TALMON 51<br />

{x} is on <strong>the</strong> second (day) in (<strong>the</strong> week of) Abiah (which falls) on <strong>the</strong> twentyfifth<br />

(of <strong>the</strong> eighth lunar month); <strong>and</strong> duqah is on <strong>the</strong> third day in Mijamin<br />

(which falls) on <strong>the</strong> twelfth in it (<strong>the</strong> eighth solar month).<br />

According to <strong>the</strong> prevailing opinion this roster evinces an intention to<br />

fully synchronize <strong>the</strong> solar with <strong>the</strong> lunar year, singling out <strong>the</strong> propitious<br />

nights of <strong>the</strong> new <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> full moon. In contrast, I maintain that <strong>the</strong> alignment<br />

of only two specific days in every lunar month with concordant<br />

dates in <strong>the</strong> solar calendar is intended to specify <strong>the</strong> ominous days (actually<br />

nights) of <strong>the</strong> moon’s waning <strong>and</strong> total eclipse. <strong>The</strong>se phases are<br />

identified by dates in <strong>the</strong> solar calendar to enable <strong>the</strong> Covenanters to<br />

beware of <strong>the</strong>m. This interpretation of <strong>the</strong> text is supported by 1 Enoch<br />

72:37. <strong>The</strong> author holds up <strong>the</strong> moon’s inconstancy, which can be most<br />

clearly observed twice every month, as a sign of its inferiority to <strong>the</strong> sun,<br />

which never changes: <strong>the</strong> sun “does nei<strong>the</strong>r diminish (in respect to its<br />

brightness),” as <strong>the</strong> moon does in <strong>the</strong> night of duqa/oh when it begins to<br />

wane, “nor take rest,” like <strong>the</strong> moon at its total eclipse in <strong>the</strong> night of x,<br />

“but continues to run day <strong>and</strong> night.” 54<br />

<strong>The</strong> advocates of <strong>the</strong> solar calendar decried <strong>the</strong> observance of <strong>the</strong><br />

lunar ephemeris as adherence to “<strong>the</strong> feasts of <strong>the</strong> gentiles, after <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

errors <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir ignorance” (Jub. 6:35). Rabbinic tradition turned <strong>the</strong><br />

accusation around: “Israel reckons by <strong>the</strong> moon <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gentiles reckon<br />

by <strong>the</strong> sun,” 55 <strong>and</strong> stressed <strong>the</strong> exclusive legitimacy of <strong>the</strong> lunar calendar<br />

by quoting Ps 28:5:<br />

“Because <strong>the</strong>y do not pay heed to <strong>the</strong> deeds of YHWH nor <strong>the</strong> work of his<br />

h<strong>and</strong>s, he shall destroy <strong>the</strong>m,” <strong>the</strong> “deeds of his h<strong>and</strong>s,” <strong>the</strong>se are <strong>the</strong> new<br />

moons, as is written “he made (appointed) <strong>the</strong> moon for (determining <strong>the</strong>)<br />

seasons” (Ps 104:19)…”he shall destroy <strong>the</strong>m,” <strong>the</strong>se are <strong>the</strong> heretics who<br />

do not observe ei<strong>the</strong>r appointed days or periods…he will destroy <strong>the</strong>m in<br />

this world <strong>and</strong> will not build <strong>the</strong>m up in <strong>the</strong> world to come. 56<br />

54. See also Shemaryahu Talmon, “Anti-Lunar Calendar Polemics in Covenanters’<br />

Writings.”<br />

55. Mekilta de-Rabbi Ishmael, Tractate Pish[a, ch. 2, 39–41 (trans. <strong>and</strong> ed. J. Z.<br />

Lauterbach; Philadelphia: JPS, 1933), 1:18 (published in a new edition as Mekilta of<br />

Rabbi Ishmael [trans. <strong>and</strong> ed. J. Z. Lauterbach; Philadelphia: JPS, 2001]).<br />

56. Midrash Tehillim (ed. S. Buber; Lemberg, 1899, reprinted New York: OM Publishing,<br />

1947), 230.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!