16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JAMES H. CHARLESWORTH 21<br />

May he bless you with all good <strong>and</strong> keep you from all evil;<br />

May he enlighten your heart with insight for living,<br />

May he favor you with eternal knowledge.<br />

May he lift up his merciful countenance toward you for eternal peace. (1QS<br />

2.1–4) 70<br />

Initially, <strong>the</strong> blessing following a heartfelt confession would have been<br />

appealing. And it would even be more attractive when one not only<br />

perceives but also experiences how <strong>the</strong> blessing is fashioned upon <strong>the</strong><br />

memory of reciting with o<strong>the</strong>r priests <strong>the</strong> Aaronic (or priestly) Blessing:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Lord bless you <strong>and</strong> keep you;<br />

<strong>The</strong> Lord make his face to shine upon you, <strong>and</strong> be gracious to you;<br />

<strong>The</strong> Lord lift up his countenance upon you, <strong>and</strong> give you peace. (Num<br />

6:24–26 NRSV)<br />

When <strong>the</strong> Baptizer would have heard <strong>the</strong> blessing on “all <strong>the</strong> men of<br />

God’s lot,” during his early years at Qumran, he might have conceived<br />

that <strong>the</strong>se also included Zechariah, his fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> priest. Eventually, he<br />

would learn that his fa<strong>the</strong>r would have been perceived by <strong>the</strong><br />

Qumranites as one of <strong>the</strong> Sons of Darkness <strong>and</strong> one who did not belong<br />

to “<strong>the</strong> men of God’s lot.” I have no doubt that <strong>the</strong>re were additional<br />

words in <strong>the</strong> ceremony for covenantal renewal that would have disturbed<br />

<strong>the</strong> Baptizer. This assumption seems to be a reliable historical insight, if<br />

we can trust <strong>the</strong> portrait of <strong>the</strong> Baptizer given to us by Josephus <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Evangelists. 71<br />

I have no doubt that eventually <strong>the</strong> Baptizer would have been disturbed<br />

by <strong>the</strong> words that followed <strong>the</strong> blessing just quoted from <strong>the</strong> Rule<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Community. Possibly, he would have first recited <strong>the</strong>se words, <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>n, over time, mou<strong>the</strong>d <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n finally refused to say <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Subsequently, he would have been signaled out for severe punishment<br />

because he would not say <strong>the</strong> requisite “Amen, amen.” Here is <strong>the</strong> section<br />

of <strong>the</strong> liturgy of covenantal renewal that John <strong>the</strong> Baptizer would most<br />

likely have found difficult <strong>and</strong> eventually impossible to affirm:<br />

<strong>The</strong>n <strong>the</strong> Levites shall curse <strong>the</strong> men of Belial’s lot; <strong>the</strong>y shall respond<br />

<strong>and</strong> say:<br />

70. Charlesworth, “Rule of <strong>the</strong> Community” (PTSDSSP 1), 9.<br />

71. See esp. Walter Wink, John <strong>the</strong> Baptist in <strong>the</strong> Gospel Tradition (Cambridge:<br />

Cambridge University Press, 1968); <strong>and</strong> Paul W. Hollenbach, “John <strong>the</strong> Baptist,”<br />

887–99. Hollenbach rightly thinks that John may have lived at Qumran “for a<br />

while” (898).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!