10.07.2015 Views

reynolds-the-quran-in-its-historical-context-2

reynolds-the-quran-in-its-historical-context-2

reynolds-the-quran-in-its-historical-context-2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

380 Gerald Hawt<strong>in</strong>gthird person (<strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit) were often talked of us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> language appropriate.to angels, and <strong>in</strong> some Jewish groups a particular, named angel (Metatron, Y ahoel, ·etc.) came to be understood as God's equivalent or doppelganger. Among Jewishand Christian groups often described as Gnostic, <strong>the</strong> creation of <strong>the</strong> world is sometimesascribed to one or more of <strong>the</strong>se angels and thus God was removed from <strong>the</strong>creation of matter, which <strong>the</strong>y regarded as evil.It is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>context</strong> of <strong>the</strong>se types of ideas, <strong>the</strong>n, that Qur'anic material perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gto angels should be placed. Specifically here, when <strong>the</strong> opponents of <strong>the</strong> messengerreject him because he is merely a human be<strong>in</strong>g, and bemoan <strong>the</strong> fact that an angelhas not come with, to, or upon him, we should be aware not only of <strong>the</strong> extendedconcept of an angel but also of <strong>the</strong> application of <strong>the</strong> idea of angel to o<strong>the</strong>r spiritualentities such as <strong>the</strong> spirit and holy spirit, traditionally understood to be <strong>the</strong>entity that <strong>in</strong>spires <strong>the</strong> Prophet. 20It is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> surviv<strong>in</strong>g evidence for Jewish Christianity that we f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> strongestl<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> ideas of prophet, spirit and angel. That evidence naturally presentsconsiderable problems of evaluation and <strong>in</strong>terpretation. A large part of our <strong>in</strong>formationderives from heresiographers and historians of <strong>the</strong> Church who reflect"orthodox" viewpo<strong>in</strong>ts, <strong>the</strong> best known probably be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Ecclesiastical History(Panarion, "medic<strong>in</strong>e chest"), or Adversus Haereses ofEpiphanius (d. 403). Suchsources sometimes supply quotations from texts attributed to <strong>the</strong> sect or sectsunder discussion, for example <strong>the</strong> so-called Gospel of <strong>the</strong> Ebionites. Anyonefamiliar with Islamic heresiography will be aware of <strong>the</strong> problems posed by suchsources: not merely <strong>the</strong> hostile viewpo<strong>in</strong>t, but also <strong>the</strong> copy<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>formationfrom one author to ano<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> difficulty of ascerta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sources of somecrucial details, and <strong>the</strong> tendency among writers to reconcile, by various stratagems,<strong>in</strong>consistent <strong>in</strong>formation from <strong>the</strong> texts available to <strong>the</strong>m and sometimesfrom personal knowledge. 21There are, however, a few surviv<strong>in</strong>g texts that appear to reflect, <strong>in</strong> places atleast, ideas accepted as those of Jewish-Christian circles. The most substantialare <strong>the</strong> so-called Pseudo-Clement<strong>in</strong>e Literature (<strong>the</strong> Homilies and Recognitionsattributed to Peter's successor as bishop of Rome), although <strong>the</strong> dat<strong>in</strong>g andcomposition histocy of such works, and <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong>m, presentfur<strong>the</strong>r difficulties. Both <strong>the</strong> Homilies and <strong>the</strong> Recognitions are probablyfourth-centucy elaborations of a third-centucy core text (often called <strong>the</strong>20 In <strong>the</strong> work generally known as <strong>the</strong> Ascension of Isaiah, probably compiled <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form <strong>in</strong> which weknow it <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second century and <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g material ofboth Jewish and Christian orig<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> holy spiritis assimilated to Gabriel and referred to as <strong>the</strong> angel of <strong>the</strong> holy spirit (Danielou, Theo/ogie, 177-80).At one po<strong>in</strong>t (9:32) <strong>the</strong> text speaks of"<strong>the</strong> angel of <strong>the</strong> holy spirit who speaks <strong>in</strong> you (i.e. <strong>in</strong> Isaiah) and<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r righteous men." Ano<strong>the</strong>r second-century text, <strong>the</strong> Christian Shepherd of Hennas, refers -apparently uniquely <strong>in</strong> early Christian texts- to "<strong>the</strong> angel of <strong>the</strong> spirit of prophecy" (mandate II,verse 9).21 For an analysis of <strong>the</strong> evidence about Jewish Christianity to be found <strong>in</strong> Patristic writ<strong>in</strong>gs, and apresentation of <strong>the</strong> relevant passages <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir orig<strong>in</strong>al languages and <strong>in</strong> English translation, seeA.F.J. Klijn and G.J. Re<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>k, Patristic Evidence for Jewish Christian Sects, Lei den: Brill 1973.Messengers and angels <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Qur ·an 381Gnmdschrift and described as a romance or novel) that may <strong>its</strong>elf have beencompiled from earlier Jewish-Christian sources.ZZWe are not concerned here with whe<strong>the</strong>r what we are told about <strong>the</strong> ideas of anyparticular secfis or is not accurate or true. The <strong>in</strong>formation provided by <strong>the</strong> heresiographersand o<strong>the</strong>r writers is significant for us as a body of concepts and beliefsknown <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first four Christian centuries. Some of <strong>the</strong>m may have been falselyascribed to a particular group but <strong>the</strong>re is evidence that <strong>the</strong>y were commoncurrency <strong>in</strong> Jewish-Christian and Gnostic circles and some are attested <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> literaturethat comes from <strong>the</strong>m.It is chiefly <strong>in</strong> ideas about Jesus, prophecy and revelation that material relevantto <strong>the</strong> notions of <strong>the</strong> opponents of <strong>the</strong> messenger of <strong>the</strong> Qur'an appears, It is·. impossible to generalize about Jewish-Christian Christology, but Christ, calledfrequently <strong>the</strong> True Prophet <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Homilies and Recognitions, often is referred toas an angel or spirit.'The attribution by Epiphanius of three understand<strong>in</strong>gs of Christ among <strong>the</strong>Ebionites is perhaps not to be taken literally but will be a convenient start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>tfor <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g discussion.a. Some identified him with Adam, created when God blew his breath (epipnoias,not pneuma) <strong>in</strong>to him. 23b. O<strong>the</strong>rs said he is from above, created first, a spirit (pneuma) above all <strong>the</strong>angels, lord of all [scil. of <strong>the</strong> angels],.called Christ and chosen for all eternity;he entered <strong>in</strong>to Adam (en ti5i Adam el<strong>the</strong>), has appeared <strong>in</strong> human form(clo<strong>the</strong>d <strong>in</strong> a body: endoumenos to soma) to various patriarchs, and f<strong>in</strong>allycame at <strong>the</strong> end of time clo<strong>the</strong>d with <strong>the</strong> body of Adam to be crucified, raisedup and to return on high.c. The third op<strong>in</strong>ion is that <strong>the</strong> spirit who is Christ descended on Jesus. 24The sources of this <strong>in</strong>formation are not obvious, but Epiphanius had access tosome Jewish-Christian literature (all of which he assumed to be Ebionite) as wellas <strong>the</strong> works of some of his predecessors. 25The second position among <strong>the</strong> Ebionites recorded by Epiphanius identifiesChrist as a spirit who rules <strong>the</strong> angels, a sort of archangel but greater: "He was notbegotten by God <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, but created like one of <strong>the</strong> archangels, be<strong>in</strong>g greater22 On <strong>the</strong> Pseudo-Clement<strong>in</strong>es, see F.S. Jones, "Clement<strong>in</strong>es, Pseudo-," <strong>in</strong> The Anchor BibleDictionary, 5:1061-62, and idem, "The Pseudo-Clement<strong>in</strong>es" <strong>in</strong> Jackson-McCabe (ed.), JewishChristianity Reconsidered: Reth<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Ancient Groups and Texts, M<strong>in</strong>neapolis: Fortress Press,2007, 285-304. How far <strong>the</strong> Homilies and <strong>the</strong> Recognitions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form <strong>in</strong> which we have <strong>the</strong>m areJewish-Christian documents is a disputed issue, but Jones argues that <strong>the</strong> Grundschriji, <strong>the</strong>so-called Periodoi Petrou, uses Jewish-Christian sources and reflects Jewish-Christian doctr<strong>in</strong>es.23 Cf. Q 3:59, which explicitly compares Jesus and Adam but refers to <strong>the</strong> creation of <strong>the</strong> latter fromdust and <strong>the</strong> utterance of <strong>the</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e fiat. Q 15:29 and 38:72, however, do allude to <strong>the</strong> creation ofAdam when God brea<strong>the</strong>d His spirit <strong>in</strong>to him, while 21:91 and 66:12 talk of <strong>the</strong> conception ofJesus when God brea<strong>the</strong>d His spirit <strong>in</strong>to Mary, and 4:171 refers to Jesus as a spirit from God.24 See <strong>the</strong> excerpt from <strong>the</strong> Panarion at Klijn and Re<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>k, Patristic Evidence, 176-79.25 Klijn and Re<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>k, Patristic Evidence, 30-33.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!