422 Waleed Ahmedexegetes fi"om <strong>the</strong> generation of <strong>the</strong> tabi 'z7n, namely Mujahid b. Jabr (d. 104/722)and Sa'id b. Jubayr (d. 95/712). 40 It was to ga<strong>in</strong> wide approval among Muslimexegetes. 41 ·A third. position, which seems to have appeared <strong>in</strong> response to <strong>the</strong> two previousviews, is attributed to Ibn 'Abbas (d. 68/687-8). Qurtubitransm<strong>its</strong>, on <strong>the</strong> authorityof Ibn 'Abbas, that <strong>the</strong> chiefs of <strong>the</strong> So do mites (nt 'as a 'uhum) had askedLot repeatedly to give <strong>the</strong>m his daughters <strong>in</strong> marriage, but Lot had not given<strong>the</strong>m an answer, or he had always refused (ja-lam yujibhum). 42 Accord<strong>in</strong>g tothis view, when <strong>the</strong> Sodomites attacked Lot's house he offered <strong>the</strong>ir chiefs hisdaughters <strong>in</strong> marriage, hop<strong>in</strong>g that this act would diffuse <strong>the</strong> confrontation andsave his guests. 43Although <strong>the</strong> marriage hypo<strong>the</strong>sis is, by far, <strong>the</strong> most popular <strong>in</strong>terpretation ofLot's offer among Muslim exegetes, <strong>the</strong>re have been o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>terpretations of thisoffer which are also attributed to exegetes from <strong>the</strong> tabi 'zln generation. Ibn AbiNajil;t (d. 131/748-9)-a student ofMujahid- is recorded <strong>in</strong> Tabari's commentaryto have asserted that <strong>the</strong> Qur'an did not state whe<strong>the</strong>r Lot offered <strong>the</strong> Sodomitesfornication or marriage. 44 We f<strong>in</strong>d ano<strong>the</strong>r exa~ple <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> commentary of Qurtubi,who relates that 'Ikrima (d. 105/723-4), <strong>the</strong> client of Ibn 'Abbas, asserted that Lotdid not truly offer <strong>the</strong> Sodomites his own daughters nor <strong>the</strong> women of his nation,~ut simply put forth this offer hop<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> Sodomites would leave (lam ya 'ridalayhim banatihl wa-la banati ummatihl, wa-<strong>in</strong>nama qala lahum hadhali-yam;arifii). 45 Qurtubi' transm<strong>its</strong> also that Abu 'Ubayda (presumably AbU'Ubayda Ma'mar b. al-Muthanna al-Taymi, who died between 207/822 and213/828) expressed a considerably similar view to that of 'Ikrima. Accord<strong>in</strong>g toQurtubi, this view was endorsed by a group (ta 'ifa) of <strong>the</strong> early exegetes. AbU'Ubayda asserts that Lot's offer was a means of"defense" and he did not <strong>in</strong>tendto follow through on it (<strong>in</strong>nama kana al-kalam mudaja 'a wa-lam yurid imfia 'hu). 46Accord<strong>in</strong>g to this view, Lot presented his offer as a way of sham<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Sodomitesbefore <strong>the</strong>mselves and express<strong>in</strong>g his disgust at <strong>the</strong>ir behavior. 47 In al-Qurtubi's40 Mujahid b. Jabr and Sa 'rd b. Jubayr are consistently mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sources to have endorsed thisview. See for example Tabar!, Jiimi 'al-bayi<strong>in</strong>, 12:48; Razi, 18:32; Mul.Iammad b. AJ:imad al-Ansi<strong>in</strong>al-QurtubT, ai-Jiimi' li-abkiim ai-Qur 'i<strong>in</strong>, ed. Abii lsl.Iiiq Ibrahim I !fish, Cairo: Diir a!-Katibal-'Arabr, 1967,9:76.41 See for example, 'Abd Al-Razzaq ai-.:;;an' anT, Taftir Abd Al-Razziiq b. Hammam a-San 'i<strong>in</strong>i, Beirut:Dar al-Kutub al-'llmiya, 1999, 2:306; Al.Imad b. Mul.Iammad al-Nal.Il.Iiis, Ma'ani ai-Qur'i<strong>in</strong>al-karim, ed. Mul.Iammad 'Ali al-:;;abi<strong>in</strong>T, Makka al-Mukarrama: Jiimi 'at Umm al-Qurii, 1988, 4:33;Raz!, 18:32; 'Abd Alliih b. 'Umar al-Bayc;lawT, Taftir ai-Bay(lawi: al-musammii anwiir al-tanzilwa-asriir a/~ta'wil, Cairo: Matba'at Mul.Iammad 'Ali Subayl.I, 1926, 3:115; Ismii'il b. 'Umar IbnKathir, Taftir ai-Qur 'i<strong>in</strong> al-karim, ed. Siimib. Mul.Iammad Salama, Riyadh: DiirTfua, 1997, 4:337.42 See QurtubT, 9:76.43 Ibid.44 See Tabar!, 12:48.45 See Mul.Iammad b. Al.Imad al-Ansi<strong>in</strong> al-QurtubT, 76.46 !bid.47 See ibid.Lot's daughters <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Qur'an 423words, "this is as when one who cheats o<strong>the</strong>r people of <strong>the</strong>ir money is told: eat<strong>in</strong>gsw<strong>in</strong>e is more lawful to you than do<strong>in</strong>g this" (kama yuqalz7 ti-man yunha 'an aklimal al-ghayr: al-khanzlr aballz7 !aka m<strong>in</strong> hadha). 48It is noteworthy that none of <strong>the</strong> exegetes who discussed <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation ofLot's offer cited <strong>the</strong> Prophet or one of his companions <strong>in</strong> order to au<strong>the</strong>nticate hispo<strong>in</strong>t of view, except for <strong>the</strong> tradition attributed to Ibn 'Abbas, who was himself acompanion of <strong>the</strong> Prophet. In addition, <strong>the</strong> considerable differences exhibited <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> several versions of <strong>the</strong> marriage hypo<strong>the</strong>sis seem to be attributed solely to <strong>the</strong>efforts of <strong>the</strong> Muslim exegetes to develop an <strong>in</strong>terpretation of<strong>the</strong> Lot's daughtersepisode <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Qur' an.Thus it seems that <strong>the</strong> marriage hypo<strong>the</strong>sis is not relevant to <strong>the</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>gof <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cident with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>context</strong> of <strong>the</strong> emergence of <strong>the</strong> Qur' i<strong>in</strong>- a contentionwhich is corroborate~ by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tertextual analysis I presented <strong>in</strong> both case studiesof this study. These significant differences also suggest that <strong>the</strong>re was a consciousattempt on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> majority of Muslim exegetes to shift <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretationof <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cident away from <strong>its</strong> Biblical connotations. The unpopularity of op<strong>in</strong>ionssuch as those attributed to Ibn Abi Najil;t and 'Ikrima <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> exegetical literaturesupports this contention. 49If one reads <strong>the</strong> representation of <strong>the</strong> episode of Lot's daughters <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Qur'i<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong> isolation from <strong>the</strong> pre-text(s), <strong>the</strong>n Ibn AbiNajil;t is correct: <strong>the</strong> Qur' an does notstate whe<strong>the</strong>r Lot offered <strong>the</strong> Sodomites fornication or marriage. The views attributedto 'llcrima and AbU 'Ubayda, however, are <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g. They reflect a keenknowledge of both <strong>the</strong> Biblical (and/or apocryphal) traditions and <strong>the</strong> Qur'anicrepresentation of <strong>the</strong> episode. Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>se views are au<strong>the</strong>ntically attributed t~<strong>the</strong>se figures is not <strong>the</strong> question here. If <strong>the</strong>se attributions are au<strong>the</strong>ntic, one could,at best, date <strong>the</strong>se views to <strong>the</strong> early years of <strong>the</strong> second half of <strong>the</strong> first Islamiccentury, more than forty years after <strong>the</strong> Prophet's death. What is surpris<strong>in</strong>g is that<strong>the</strong>se views do not contradict <strong>the</strong> contention that early Muslims comprehended <strong>the</strong>episode of Lot's daughters <strong>in</strong> al-lfijr and Hzld aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> backdrop of <strong>its</strong> Jewishantecedents. In fact, <strong>the</strong> views attributed to 'Ikrima and Abil 'Ubayda andal-Qurtubi's justification of <strong>the</strong>se views provide an <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to oral <strong>in</strong>formation.that may have been concomitant to <strong>the</strong> Qur'i<strong>in</strong>ic representation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>cident <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>context</strong> of th.e emergence of <strong>the</strong> Qur'i<strong>in</strong>. We might bear <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>the</strong>Islamic dogma concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> prophets' <strong>in</strong>fallibility ( 'i~mat al-anbiya) is adevelopment' subsequent to <strong>the</strong> emergence of <strong>the</strong> Qur' i<strong>in</strong>. Thus for early Muslimsit would be reasonable to conclude that Lot was be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tentionally mislead<strong>in</strong>g.He was not serious when he offered his daughters to <strong>the</strong> Sodomites <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mannerdemonstrated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first case study.48 See ibid.49 Baghawr po<strong>in</strong>ts to <strong>the</strong> view attributed to Abii 'Ubayda and states that:"<strong>the</strong>y [i.e. The majority ofexegetes] did not accept this <strong>in</strong>terpretation." See BaghawT, Ma 'iilim al-tanzil, 1985, 12:230.
424 Waleed AhmedConclusionThe analysis I have presented <strong>in</strong> this study calls for a rigorous exam<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong>Qur'1<strong>in</strong>ic narratives through <strong>the</strong> lens of lritertextuality and with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> formativecultural milieu of <strong>the</strong> Qur'i<strong>in</strong>. It suggests that an emphasis on discourse andmean<strong>in</strong>g as opposed to source-<strong>in</strong>fluence criticism could be exceptionally <strong>in</strong>formative,particularly if <strong>the</strong> gradual emergence of <strong>the</strong> corpus ofQur'anic texts is taken<strong>in</strong>to account. A comparison between <strong>the</strong> analysis I have presented and <strong>the</strong> representationof <strong>the</strong> Qur'anic account of Lot's story <strong>in</strong> Fred Leemhuis's article "Liitand His People <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Koran and <strong>its</strong> Early Commentaries" shows that Leemhuis'smethod did not enable him to discover <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tertextual mean<strong>in</strong>g embedded <strong>in</strong>verse 71 of al-lfijr and verses 78-79 of Hiid. In fact, <strong>the</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>sis of Lot's st9ry<strong>in</strong> Leemhuis's article disregards verse 71 of al-lfijr, which suggests that Leemhuisthought that verse 78 of Hiid encapsulates <strong>its</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g. 5° As I have demonstrated<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first case study, <strong>the</strong> significance of <strong>the</strong> Lot's daughters episode isequally shared between verse 71 of al-lfijr and verses 78 and 79 of Hiid. It is notonly imparted by <strong>the</strong>se verses but is also produced as a result of <strong>the</strong> audiences'"<strong>in</strong>teraction" with <strong>the</strong> parallel Biblical story earlier Qur'anic texts, and, possibly,a concomitant oral discourse.Thus far, <strong>the</strong> focus <strong>in</strong> modem scholarship has ma<strong>in</strong>ly been on del<strong>in</strong>eat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>development of narrative-text exegesis <strong>in</strong> Muslim exegetical literature or on identifY<strong>in</strong>glater additions to <strong>the</strong> Qur'anic narratives <strong>in</strong> this literature. This work iscerta<strong>in</strong>ly worth pursu<strong>in</strong>g. However, as this study demonstrates, Muslim exegeticalliterature, even if it is largely posterior to <strong>the</strong> emergence of <strong>the</strong> Qur'i<strong>in</strong>, is-important<strong>in</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> significance of <strong>the</strong> Qur'i<strong>in</strong>ic narratives with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>context</strong> of<strong>the</strong> Qur'an's <strong>in</strong>itial cultural milieu, perhaps as important as <strong>the</strong> Biblical and apocryphalsources which <strong>in</strong>fluenced-this <strong>context</strong>. Recourse to material from Qur'i<strong>in</strong>icexegesis should, however, be explicit and should not take precedence over <strong>the</strong><strong>context</strong>ual analysis of <strong>the</strong> Qur'i<strong>in</strong>ic texts <strong>the</strong>mselves. Bear<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d, anappreciation of Muslim exegetical literature can contribute positively to an<strong>in</strong>tertextual analysis of <strong>the</strong> stories of <strong>the</strong> prophets <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Qur'i<strong>in</strong>.50 See Leemhuis, "Li:i! and his people," 101-2.18 Joseph among <strong>the</strong> IshmaelitesQ 12 <strong>in</strong> light of Syriac sources 1.. IntroductionJoseph WitztumIn recent years <strong>the</strong>re has been a renewed <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study of <strong>the</strong> Qur'i<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>light of <strong>the</strong> Syriac literary tradition. Examples of :f<strong>in</strong>e studies are those of SidneyGriffith and Kev<strong>in</strong> van Blade! dedicated to <strong>the</strong> "Companions of <strong>the</strong> Cave" storyand to <strong>the</strong> Dhii 1-Qamayn narrative respectively? In this chapter I follow <strong>the</strong>irlead, with one major difference: I exam<strong>in</strong>e a Qur' i<strong>in</strong>ic retell<strong>in</strong>g of a narrative from<strong>the</strong> Hebrew Bible. Such retell<strong>in</strong>gs are often assumed to reflect Jewish traditions,and thus Western scholarship tends to ignore Christian sources. Syriac texts arecited now and <strong>the</strong>n but are not covered systematically <strong>in</strong> any manner comparableto <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> Jewish texts are treated. 3This chapter is a slightly enhanced version of an oral presentation. A fuller study will be set out <strong>in</strong>a chapter of my dissertation and published elsewhere. I thank my advisor Michael Cook, PatriciaCrone, Judith Loebenste<strong>in</strong>-Witztum, Manolis Papoutsakis and Gabriel Reynolds for <strong>the</strong>ir commentson earlier drafts. I am also grateful to Kristian Heal for generously shar<strong>in</strong>g his work before publication.Quotations from <strong>the</strong> Qur'i<strong>in</strong> are usually adapted versions of Arberry. Biblical verses are citedfrom <strong>the</strong> NRSV.2 S. Griffith, "Christia!:l Lore and <strong>the</strong> Arabic Qur'i<strong>in</strong>: The 'Companions of <strong>the</strong> Cave' <strong>in</strong> Siirat al-Kahfand <strong>in</strong> Syriac Christian tradition," <strong>in</strong> QHC, 109-37; K. van Blade!, "The Alexander Legend <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Qur'i<strong>in</strong> 18:83-102," ibid., 175-i03.3 See N.A. Stillman, ''The story of Ca<strong>in</strong> and Abel <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Qur' an and <strong>the</strong> Muslim commentators: Someobservations," JSS 19, 1974, (231-39) 231-32. Even scholars who argue for a strong Christianimpact on <strong>the</strong> Qur' an are often content with a general observation that Christians too transmittednarratives from <strong>the</strong> Hebrew Bible. Textual parallels from Christian sources are usually not pursued.One attempt to balance scholarship on this po<strong>in</strong>t will be found <strong>in</strong> my dissertation, <strong>the</strong> title of whichis The Syriac Milieu of <strong>the</strong> Quran: The Recast<strong>in</strong>g of Biblical Narratives. It <strong>in</strong>cludes a survey of <strong>the</strong>studies which did take <strong>in</strong>to account oriental Christian literature. See for now, S. Lee, ControversialTracts on Christianity and Mohammedanism, Cambridge: Smith, 1824, 124-38 (I am <strong>in</strong>debted toKriszt<strong>in</strong>a Szilagyi for this reference); T. Andrae, Les orig<strong>in</strong>es de /'islam et le christianisme, Paris:Adrien-Maisonneuve, 1955, 201-2; and <strong>the</strong> occasional comments <strong>in</strong> H. Speyer, Die biblischenErziihlzmgen im Qoran, Hildesheim: Olrns, 1961. A more recent example is G.S. Reynolds,"Redeem<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Adam of <strong>the</strong> Qur'i<strong>in</strong>," <strong>in</strong> D. Kreikenbom et al. (eds), Arabische Christen- Christen<strong>in</strong> Arabien, Frankfurt am Ma<strong>in</strong>: Peter Lang, 2007, 71-83.
- Page 1 and 2:
New Perspectives on the Qur'anIn th
- Page 3 and 4:
New Perspectives onthe Qur)anThe Qu
- Page 5 and 6:
ContentsAcknowledgementsContributor
- Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgements xiiiAcknowledgemen
- Page 9 and 10:
xviContributorsCompanion to the Qur
- Page 11 and 12:
xxForewordIf we were to leave thing
- Page 13 and 14:
2 Gabriel Said ReynoldsIn the intro
- Page 15 and 16:
6 Gabriel Said Reynoldscontribution
- Page 17 and 18:
10 Gabriel Said ReynoldsA different
- Page 19 and 20:
14 Gabriel Said ReynoldsAnd He sent
- Page 21 and 22:
18 Gabriel Said Reynoldsnames and d
- Page 23 and 24:
·Part I···Method in Qur)anic st
- Page 25 and 26:
26 Fred M Donnerable to determine m
- Page 27 and 28:
30 Fred M Donnerabout which the tra
- Page 29 and 30:
34 Fred M Donnerhistorian cannot ac
- Page 31 and 32:
Studies in Qur 'anic vocabulary 392
- Page 33 and 34:
42 Andrew Rippinforeign is not clea
- Page 35 and 36:
46 Andrew Rippinsuggestion could al
- Page 37 and 38:
50 Nasr Abu Zaydfrom the perspectiv
- Page 39 and 40:
54 Nasr Abu Zaydstudy (1968-72), Eg
- Page 41 and 42:
58 Nasr Abu Zaydthe commencement (i
- Page 43 and 44:
62 Nasr Abu ZaydThe second phenomen
- Page 45 and 46:
66 Nasr Abu Zaydare intended to rea
- Page 47 and 48:
70 Nasr Abu Zaydchapter shows that
- Page 49 and 50:
74 Nasr Abu ZaydMuslim jurists,fitq
- Page 51 and 52:
78 Nasr Abu ZaydFor the natures of
- Page 53 and 54:
82 Nasr Abu Zaydcertain, whereas th
- Page 55 and 56:
86 Nasr Abu Zaydyour lord?' They sa
- Page 57 and 58:
The Jews of the Hijaz in theQur' an
- Page 59 and 60:
94 Robert G. Hoylandit by hereditar
- Page 61 and 62:
98 Robert G. HoylandScript/Lang.: L
- Page 63 and 64:
102 Robert G. HoylandNo.24Place: al
- Page 65 and 66:
106 Robert G. HoylandThough classed
- Page 67 and 68:
110 Robert G. Hoyland"Akrabos ben S
- Page 69 and 70:
114 Robert G. HoylandThe only probl
- Page 71 and 72:
118 Hani HayajnehScattered hints ar
- Page 73 and 74:
122 Hani Hayajnehand the situations
- Page 75 and 76:
126 llanillayqinehthat can elucidat
- Page 77 and 78:
130 Hani Hayajnehpreserved in the c
- Page 79 and 80:
134 Hani Hayajneh3. al-UkhdiidQur'a
- Page 81 and 82:
138 Hani Hayajneh"deliver, preserve
- Page 83 and 84:
142 Hani Hayajnehits common tribal
- Page 85 and 86:
146 Hani Hayajneh"l) 'mkrb son of ~
- Page 87 and 88:
148 Gerd-R. PuinThe orthography oft
- Page 89 and 90:
152 Gerd-R. PuinVowel letters and o
- Page 91 and 92:
156 Gerd-R. Puinto be explained as
- Page 93 and 94:
160 Gerd-R. Puinmade identical with
- Page 95 and 96:
164 Gerd-R. Puin(66) fhJ( 67) \J.J
- Page 97 and 98:
168 Gerd-R. Puin(Q 51 :47). Here, i
- Page 99 and 100:
172 Gerd-R. Puin16:69 16:69 D =16:9
- Page 101 and 102:
176 Gerd-R. Puinaccusative, but has
- Page 103 and 104:
186 Gerd-R. PuinHowever, neither th
- Page 105 and 106:
184 Gerd-R. PuinIn M.F. Malik's tra
- Page 107 and 108:
188 Gerd-R. PuinAl-ntb' al-awwal mi
- Page 109 and 110:
Hapaxes in the Qur'an:identifying a
- Page 111 and 112:
196 Shawkat M Toorawathe works of M
- Page 113 and 114:
200 Shawkat M ToorawaIn his 1966 Le
- Page 115 and 116:
204 Shawkat M ToordWa"any biblical
- Page 117 and 118:
208 Shawkat M Toorawa Hapaxes in th
- Page 119 and 120:
212 Shawkat M Toorawa Hapaxes in th
- Page 121 and 122:
216 Shawkat M Toorawa Hapaxes in th
- Page 123 and 124:
Hapaxes in the Qur'an 221220 Shawka
- Page 125 and 126:
224 Shawkat M Toorawa Hapax.es in t
- Page 127 and 128:
228 Shawkat M Toorawa Hapaxes in th
- Page 129 and 130:
232 Shawkat M Toorawa Hapax:es in t
- Page 131 and 132:
Hapaxes in the Qur'an 237236 Shawka
- Page 133 and 134:
240 Shawkat M Toorawafrom a shared
- Page 135 and 136:
244 Shaw/cat M Toorawasix. And in a
- Page 137 and 138:
248 Manfred KroppQur'anic corpus wh
- Page 139 and 140:
252 Manfred Kroppobscurum per obscu
- Page 141 and 142:
256 Manfred KroppNow the verb kana,
- Page 143 and 144:
260 Manfred KroppHaving in mind now
- Page 145 and 146:
264 Manfred KroppTo conclude this s
- Page 147 and 148:
268 Munther YounesThe wordgharq vio
- Page 149 and 150:
272 Mzmther Youneslater came to be
- Page 151 and 152:
276 Munther YounesThe verb nashit,
- Page 153 and 154:
280 Christoph LuxenbergEdessa, whic
- Page 155 and 156:
284 Christoph Luxenberg14 He had be
- Page 157 and 158:
288 Christoph Luxenbergvariants in
- Page 159 and 160:
292 Christoph Luxenberg11. mil kadh
- Page 161 and 162:
296 Christoph Luxenbergapplication
- Page 163 and 164:
Al-Nafilirii in the Qur' anA hermen
- Page 165 and 166:
304 Sidney Griffithonly Persian pag
- Page 167 and 168:
308 Sidney Griffithand al-na~ara as
- Page 169 and 170:
312 Sidney Griffiththis manner the
- Page 171 and 172:
316 Sidney Griffithpassages that eq
- Page 173 and 174: 320 Sidney Griffithincluded Jews an
- Page 175 and 176: 324 Devin J. StewartMore r~cently,
- Page 177 and 178: 328 Devin J. Stewart(Q 101:9-11), t
- Page 179 and 180: 332 Devin J. Stewartpagans assign t
- Page 181 and 182: 336 Devin J. StewartOmen texts were
- Page 183 and 184: 340 Devin J. StewartQur'an in the s
- Page 185 and 186: 344 Devin J. StewartThi~ idea may t
- Page 187 and 188: 348 Devin J. Stewartand so on, are
- Page 189 and 190: 352 Su{eiman A. Mouraddid not come
- Page 191 and 192: 356 Suleiman A. Mouradaccusation. T
- Page 193 and 194: 360 Clare WildeJudea-Christian comm
- Page 195 and 196: 364 Clare WildeBible was recognized
- Page 197 and 198: 368 Clare WildeRecitation or codex-
- Page 199 and 200: Messengers and angels in the Qur'an
- Page 201 and 202: 376 Gerald HawtingIt was indicated
- Page 203 and 204: 380 Gerald Hawtingthird person (the
- Page 205 and 206: 384 Gerald HawtingInherent in all o
- Page 207 and 208: 388 Gerald HawtingChristianity that
- Page 209 and 210: Is there a notion of "divineelectio
- Page 211 and 212: 396 Reuven FirestoneThe New Testame
- Page 213 and 214: 400 Reuven Firestonethrough. a fire
- Page 215 and 216: 404 Reuven FirestoneMost of the ter
- Page 217 and 218: 408 Reuven Firestoneof the religiou
- Page 219 and 220: 412 Waleed Ahmedassess the early Mu
- Page 221 and 222: 416 Waleed Ahmedabsent (mal;zdhz7f,
- Page 223: 420 Waleed AhmedThe main problem wi
- Page 227 and 228: 428 Joseph Witztumhomily by Narsai.
- Page 229 and 230: 432 Joseph Witztumin the story keep
- Page 231 and 232: 436 Joseph Witztumexample,,when Jac
- Page 233 and 234: 440 Joseph WitztumAnd again they sa
- Page 235 and 236: 444 Joseph Witztum?ialect and might
- Page 237 and 238: 448 Joseph Witztumnot that.the Syri
- Page 239 and 240: 452 Emran El-BadawiOther scholars r
- Page 241 and 242: 456 Emran El-BadawiCenturies of Ara
- Page 243 and 244: 460 Emran El-Badawi!ewish scri~es.
- Page 245 and 246: 464 Emran El-Badawistranger, clothi
- Page 247 and 248: 468 Adam Silverstein"Egypt." 4 But
- Page 249 and 250: 472 Adam Silversteinhoweve~, are la
- Page 251 and 252: 476 Adam Silversteinto build a ~arb
- Page 253 and 254: 480 BibliographyAbii al-Futiil;!, M
- Page 255 and 256: 484 Bibliography--Homiliae Selectae
- Page 257 and 258: 488 BibliographyBeyer, K. and A. Li
- Page 259 and 260: 492 BibliographyGallez, E.-M. Le me
- Page 261 and 262: 496 BibliographyKahle, P.E. "The Qu
- Page 263 and 264: 500 BibliographyMcAuliffe, J.D. Qur
- Page 265 and 266: 504 Bibliography--"Die Wissenschaft
- Page 267 and 268: 508 BibliographySpitaler, A. "Die N
- Page 269 and 270: Index of Qur' anic citationsand ref
- Page 271 and 272: 516 Index of Qur 'anic citations an
- Page 273 and 274: 520 Index of Qur 'iinic citations a
- Page 275 and 276:
524 Index of Qur 'anic citations an
- Page 277 and 278:
Index of people, places and subject
- Page 279 and 280:
532 Index of people, places and sub
- Page 281 and 282:
536 Index of people, places and sub