epigrammatum anthologia palatina - Notes du mont Royal

CCXI. Lemma : 4vd67)ua rij aurij napa Ka/.vpta; (sinPaulss.). lapStxov xai TOUTO (respectu ad cp. 203 ct aliu).— 2 noppupeuv Codex, quod Meinek. p. 112 reduxit. Editic.ppvoouv. •< Lesbiam comam dici videri adscitiliamaiiuotarunt Reisk. et Toup. In Luciani Dial. mcretr. 5exliihetur Lesbia mulier xr,vr,xrj instructa. > Jac. —i. « Pro scripto (leXouyov bene vidcrat cum Toupio LardierusDiss. de Venere p. 287 legcndum csse pviXovyov,ted vxXoyfox prave dc pellucido intcllcxit. •> B. Est coloriscterulei, subviridis. — c. « Fv7|xia (sic Cod.) Kvrtpt multisvariisquc conjecturis tcutatum cst. Inconsideratc Toup.et Ilrunek. Kvr.oia, quod nihil cst (conf. Porson. ad Toup.Emend. IV, p. 457). Ncc bcne Jacobs. yvriaiav dc legitimaVenere interpretatur, quam vagac et vetitaj opponi existimat;nam Yvr,aio; non legilimus est, scd gcnuinus. Acceditcorreptio syllaba: antc yvr,(iia, qua> in castigatopceta, qualis Leonidas est, non sine oflensione fuerit.Mibinon videturposse dubitari quin Kpr, aia Kvnpt scribendumsit. In Creta res agitur apud Leonidam ctiainahisepigrammatis, v. c. 262, 289. •• Meinek. — 7xaX)txpiaisici Codcx, corr. Jac, qucin sequitur Mcinck.; Uoiss.kx/Jixpeia cum Brunckio.CCXII. Lemma : dvderiua. Carmen injuria in suspicionemvo8eix; vocatum esse ab Reiskio et Schneidewino(p. 227) consentiunt Ilcckerus et licrgkius Lyr. p. 921. —1 Toi; Salmasius, quod receperunt Schncidew. ct Hcck.,post Brunckium; TM Codex; aoi; nialit Bergk. — 2. •< ExistimandumApollinis tcmplum in loro cxstructuin, undeipse deus ri;; dyop7); 7rpuTxvt; vocatur. Sic Diana ap. Soph.CEd. T. 161, xvxXoevr' dyopd; 6po.ov eux.ex Oiaoet. Et CorinthiApollinis statua ex asre fuil in foro, 'A7i6'/Xti>v enii)r,oivKXipio;, Pausan. II, 2. » Jac 3 xat ol et xopuvOovCod. — 4 oeoitora TOI; arep. Codcx. •• Oliendunl ad noineucesxora viri critici, ut pro spurio habeant cpigramma,saltem finem. Sed putaverim potius faisumesse Simonidisnomen, et poetam quemcunque, nunc ignotum, fuisseCytonis servum ac pro bero versus illos composuisse.Major difficultas in oTejd-.oi;. » B. Sed al) aliis criticisrerte animadversus est antiquus et simplex nitor carminis.Jac. conjiciebatatvov £yei; y.apiTMV, atat rcdtpav aTisavot;,cojus conjecturs incommoda exponit Hcckerus, ipse proponeoslenem et aptissimam emeudationem, quam recepimus.• Coronas summa arte et venustate confcctasApollini dedit dona artifex Cyto, ut auream coronamilem Apollini tribuit Flamininus Plut. Flam. c. 12. » Ingeniose,ut omuia, Bergkius : « Simplicissimum fuerit :«tvov eyoi;'yatp' tov, oforcoTa, TOI; avepdvot;, ut ipsedens invocetur; sed videtur aliuil latere, fort. atvov £/et;,Xxpituv 6' £ a rt e T* 6 it:; oTtpdvot;. »CCXIII. Lemma : 4vd8r]|/.a. « Agiturdc victoriis, quasSimouides ex certaminibus poetarum ditbyrambicorumrrtulerat : quod indicat taurorum mentio. In his ccrtaminibuseum Lasum llermionensem habuisse adversarinm,constat cx Aristoph. Vesp. 1391, ubi v. scliol. >• Jac.— I atpwviSr,; rjpao Cod., T posito super ao, ut ficrctfpKo. Editum praebet Tzctzeslocomox affcrcndo. •• Junxitportatauros et tripodas, quod aliis locis tripodas abstulerat,ut Athenis, aliis tauros. » Schhcideiv. p. 191. —3 tooodxt; tu.., dcleto 8", Hccker. I, p. 149. — Ad hujusrarminis similitudinem exprcssum cst cpigramma in Siinonidemmortuum, quod affert Tzet/.cs Hist. I, 636, a Baccbylidecompositum, ut statuit Schneidewinus :IN GAPUT VI ANNOTATIO. 217"Ef eVt Tt£vTr,xovra, E.pumor,, r,pao vixa;xai TpirtoSa;" 6vr)xxet; 8' £v Eixe.ip 7te8io>.Keitp os u.v^ur,v >.e : Ttet;, "EXXriai 8' £rtatvovcu;uv£iou tyvyr,t ar,; (TO:; Schncidcr.) e7ttyeivope'vot;.Sequitur in Codice cpigramtna Simonidis jam supraexhibitum n. 144.CCXIV. Lemma : dviOr.ux •• Epigramma inscriptuin, •tripodi illi qucm Gelon, victoria du Carthaginiensihus adIlimcram jiarta (olynip. 75, a. 1), una cum fratribusApollini dicavit. Vidc Diodor. XI, 26. » Jac. AfTcrt scholiastesPindari Pyth. I, 155 : oxoi 8e TOV re/.aiva TOU; d-.eXfou;fiXofpovoupevov dvaOeivat TIO 8EU> ypuaov; TpitcoSx; (sic),£iriYpdTpavra Taura' d>r,ai XTX. •• Kx cpio gallice vcrtit BoissyusVit. Simon. p. 106. •• B. Cuin Diodoro consnntiuntPhanias Eresius ct Thcopompus ap. Athcn. VI, p. 231, F.— 2 Aetvoueveu; schol. Pind., quo nomine erat Grlonispatcr; Atouevev; Cod. Deiiidu scliol. TOU; Tptitooa; 6;'uevat.Scd Suidas etiam v. Aapetiou ut Ccdcx, et unus fuit tripuz.— 3 11 Cod. ct Suid.; corrcxit Bnckhius Metrolog. Vntersuch.p. 295 ct 304, uhi lioc distichon, n scliol. Pind.omissum, viudicat a Schncidcw ini (p. ] 83 seqq.) suspicione,qui subdititium putahat. —4 Saperiou Codcx (cum suspicionisnota) ct Suidas. « Boissyus sclinliasten exprimciisvitavit diflicuitalcm quac cst in adjcctivo AapeTiou, qund; nec videtur intcllcctum fnissc a Suida, qui l.cxico idnude inseruit. Lud. Dindorfius in Thcs. Stcph. ait Aaperiouesse nihili, ac videtur probarc Wesselingii [sive Salmasii)conjccturam lcgcntis Aapeiou ad Diodor. XI, 26. [Melius0. Mnllcrus in Amalth. III, p. 27, Aapstxov yp J Magisequidcm iu Bcntlcianum [Disscrt. de Phalar. p. 259] Aa-(lapeTiou inclinarcm, IUII tamcn de IKCOIIC cum Bcntlciocngitaus, scd sc.riiicus, saitcm prnnuntiaiis, AattpETiou. ••B. Similitcr Toupus ct Schncidcw. p. 185. Bcrgkiusquo(|ue reccpit, annotans -. •< nisi fortc AauapsTou pratstat. ••N6u.toua Ar.uapertov mcmorat Diodorus I. c. ct Pollux IX,85, uhi v. llemstcrh. et alios a Schncidcw. indicatosp. 185. In finc T4; SexdTx; Ccd. ct c uid. — 5,6. Hi vcrsussuadentc Bentleio additi ex schol. Pind. — 6. « Xsip Suidacest etiam r, f)or,6ax xai h ouvaut;. Quantuin autem praesidiiSyracusanorum contra Carthaginicnscs susrcptumbellum Gratcis altulcrit, docct llerodotus VII, 163 scqq.Ac dicitur Gclon eos fudisse eodem die quo 1'crsat ad Salaminabigentein cladem accc[>eruut. » Jac.CCXV. Lemma : avaOripa T^ ATJTOI rtapa vauToiv. ProfertPlutarchus Dc inalign. Ilcrod. § 39, p. 870, F : Aiooaipoubi TIVO; TO5V Koptv6tti>v Tpi7]pdpyo> / £v tep Ar,T0u; avaOr,u.aatxeiuivot; xai TOUTO £7ttyeYpar!Tac TauT* XTX. — 1 dito Suaape'vo>vCodcx, eorruptum cx altero,quod servavit Plut.— 2 4vs'6evro Aarot Cod. et libri Pluterclii. •• Puteudumnon cst potuisse Simonidcm dc quantitetc nominis Aarotcrrare. Passovius proposuit, SitX' £6eaav A. Larcherus adPlutarchi locum intcr Herodotea t. VI, p. 499, vitium nonest odoratus. » B. Certetim correxerunt Blomfield., DcbrHHis,Ba?ckhius in Corp. Inscrr. I, p. 47, recepcruntSchncidew. et Bcrgk. At Heckcrus I, p. 133 : « Hancverbi Ibrmam poetis usitatam fuisse nego. Ati itapa XViacu xai Xo>aou;. Nutuin nomcn Ato; cx intcrpretationc nominis oo>-TTJpi. quod quum vcrsus rcspucrct, scripsi ao>Tr,p:a cxconjcrturu viri d. [iu lnargine a|>ographi ipio Keiskiusulchaturj •• B. « Abjudicaxit Scbiiciduwinus Simonidi,scd i::scrtum cst gcnuinis cpigrainmatis, ucque talislu-