You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fire, Brick, Sand, Concrete<br />
An Unlicensed Sex Shop in Britain<br />
David Kerekes<br />
The legal availability of hardcore pornography in the United<br />
Kingdom is only a relatively recent phenomenon. Whether<br />
in magazines or on video, up until 2000—the year in which<br />
hardcore was effectively legalized in the UK—an erect penis<br />
or penetration constituted the loose benchmark for what was<br />
considered hardcore, and any depiction thereof or anything<br />
more gratuitous was taboo. Possession itself was not an offense,<br />
but the means of obtaining it generally were. Because<br />
of numerous statutes—notably the Obscene Publications Act<br />
of 1959, the Post Office Act of 1953, the Customs Act of<br />
1876, and the Video Recordings Act of 1984—hardcore pornography<br />
under British law could not be imported, published,<br />
sold, or distributed.<br />
As they do today, sex shops prior to the legalization of hardcore<br />
required a license, which meant that the stock had to<br />
These tended to be watered-down<br />
versions of magazines available in<br />
more liberal countries like Denmark<br />
or the Netherlands.<br />
adhere to the law or there was the risk of a police raid, prosecution,<br />
a fine, and possibly a jail sentence. Contrary to what<br />
the staff would promise in some of these establishments,<br />
the magazines lining the shelves may have looked like the<br />
real thing, with tantalizing covers bearing titles recognizable<br />
as the European trademark of porn quality (such as Color Climax<br />
or Rodox), but in reality it was often a deception: These<br />
tended to be watered-down versions of magazines available<br />
in more liberal countries like Denmark or the Netherlands,<br />
substandard reproductions that removed the hardcore altogether.<br />
Worse still, sometimes the covers were the most hardcore<br />
element of the whole deal, the covers having been removed<br />
from the genuine article in order to mask softcore magazines<br />
of a sort readily available from any high street news agent.<br />
Imagine the frustration and disappointment of dashing home,<br />
tearing open the shrink-wrap and finding that the promise of<br />
unadulterated hot, steamy sex was in fact a several-monthold<br />
edition of Razzle—having cost four or five times the price<br />
one would normally expect to pay for such a thing.<br />
The videos in licensed sex shops bear the R18 certificate.<br />
As with most material released theatrically and on video in<br />
the UK, these were films passed by the British Board of Film<br />
Classification (BBFC). Despite the fact that the sale of product<br />
rated R18 was restricted to sex shops and therefore only<br />
available to a discerning few, their content still had to conform<br />
to strict guidelines, and in reality the tapes were only marginally<br />
more explicit than regular 18-rated films,<br />
which were available anywhere.<br />
Prior to 1997, the difference between the two<br />
ratings was that R18 allowed the depiction<br />
of non-explicit group sex and came with the<br />
somewhat ridiculous category guideline: outer labia in, inner<br />
labia out. Films were submitted to the BBFC in accordance<br />
with this criteria (it would be foolish and expensive not to, given<br />
the cost of getting a film examined by the BBFC), whether<br />
they had been shot in Britain, like the “Ben Dover” series—<br />
available overseas uncut—or imported, like the “Buttman”<br />
adventures, cut accordingly.<br />
These were the licensed sex shops. Unlicensed sex shops<br />
were an altogether different matter—they operated within a<br />
twilight zone that was outside of the law but carried a thin veneer<br />
of legitimacy in that they didn’t exactly call themselves<br />
sex shops.<br />
170 EVERYTHING YOU KNOW ABOUT SEX IS <strong>WRONG</strong>