Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
An American Health Fallacy by Edward Wallenstein (Springer<br />
Publishing, 1980).”<br />
Restored male David Steinburg is Jewish, and, despite his<br />
unhappiness with having been circumcised, he says he’s not<br />
sure he could resist it for a newborn son in the face of family<br />
pressure.<br />
Many of the rituals of the Jewish community were<br />
developed as reminders of “separateness” and<br />
don’t have any rationale other than ritual—which<br />
is fine. I do think it would be healthy—but probably<br />
impossible—for society to have something of a<br />
discussion about why keeping a foreskin is a good<br />
idea. But let’s face it—how do you get Americans<br />
to talk about sexual pleasure within the context of<br />
a newborn? It ties in too many things even openminded<br />
people are squeamish about: Parents<br />
don’t want to think about their child’s sexuality,<br />
especially that early on (if ever).<br />
As for Muslims—circumcision is not mentioned in the Koran.<br />
According to Islamic websites, “There is no compulsion to<br />
circumcision.” 28 But Sami Aldeeb found otherwise.<br />
A Muslim lawyer based in Switzerland, Aldeeb would certainly<br />
call the circumcision he underwent at age eleven compulsory.<br />
Note his discussion of anger, terror, and thoughts of<br />
suicide:<br />
One of the issues rarely discussed in the topic of<br />
circumcision is the relation between its damage<br />
and the age at which it is done[.] I was circumcised<br />
at the age of 11, during the summer break after 5th<br />
grade....<br />
Here a male janitor-nurse pulled open my hospital<br />
robe and made a quick mark on my penis. I was<br />
then given a shot and carried by that person to the<br />
operating table. The last I remember was a nurse<br />
arranging “things” on a tray. I never saw the face<br />
of the doctor as it took few seconds for me to go<br />
under full anesthesia.<br />
I woke up in a bed with my father beside me, he<br />
asked me if I knew what happened, I pulled the<br />
blanket because I could feel the dry bandage<br />
against my raw glans.… I realized what had<br />
happened.… I felt stunned. I could not say a thing.<br />
Right then I thought about suicide.<br />
After I came back home I “surveyed the damage”<br />
and counted 10 stitches. My feeling was: now I am<br />
just like all of them.<br />
Years have passed and by the age of 16, I was<br />
having painful erections....<br />
At the age of 33, I started to read about the subject<br />
on the Internet. I learned about foreskin restoration<br />
and tried a technique that worked for me. It was<br />
not the aesthetic results that I was looking for,<br />
it was the functionality, and that eliminated the<br />
premature ejaculation problem I had, just by<br />
having some loose skin during erection.<br />
Physiologically, the experience left me feeling<br />
mutilated, for no reason or benefit. It damaged<br />
the relation I had with my father, and affected my<br />
attitude toward my parents. It also affected my<br />
religious beliefs. The effort and pains thinking<br />
about the subject, reading literature, and<br />
attempting the restoration could have been better<br />
spent, if this has not been done.<br />
A few words about Islamic religion and<br />
circumcision. My understanding is that God<br />
created the human body in best image; why<br />
mutilate it? Islam prohibited practices that cause<br />
body harm, like tattoos; and prophet Muhammad<br />
himself did not undergo circumcision. 29<br />
In September 1996 the United States passed a law against<br />
female genital mutilation. Opponents of male circumcision<br />
are asking for the same. There is some tension with those<br />
who crusade against female mutilation, some of them believing<br />
that male circumcision is much less harmful and fighting<br />
it less urgent. But circumcision opponents say all involuntary<br />
genital surgery is mutilation that should be stopped. For now,<br />
we can expect that if legal prohibition comes, it will come<br />
first in Canada. Canadians are already being warned.<br />
In 1996 the Canadian Medical Association approved a code<br />
of ethics that instructs doctors to “refuse to participate in or<br />
support practices that violate basic human rights.” This suggests,<br />
Mark Jenkins writes, “that in the case of circumcision,<br />
parental preference should not override the child’s physical<br />
rights to his body.” 30<br />
The Association for Genital Integrity is in the lengthy process<br />
of challenging the ban on female genital mutilation in Canada’s<br />
Criminal Code as being discriminatory against males,<br />
who are not given similar protection.<br />
“Every day in this country a quarter of the boys that are born<br />
are having this procedure performed on them without their<br />
consent and without any medical need. We don’t see why<br />
half of our society should be protected by a law and not the<br />
CIRCUMCISION AND SEX 289