06.06.2015 Views

SEXIS WRONG

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fearless, secure; nor Thought of future Pains<br />

Resembling Pricks of Pin and Needle’s Point<br />

E’er checks his Raptures, or disturbs his Joys<br />

[Fryer, 1964, pp. 27-8]<br />

The very crudest of animal condoms were made from unprocessed<br />

skins sewn or pasted together to form a sheath. They<br />

were both unreliable and unaesthetic. The best condoms<br />

from animal ceca were produced by a lengthy and somewhat<br />

expensive process that was described in Gray’s Supplement<br />

to the Pharmacopoeia, published in 1828, but the method<br />

must have been the same earlier. Gray said the intestines<br />

of sheep should be soaked in water for several hours, then<br />

turned inside out, macerated again in a weak alkaline solution<br />

that was changed every twelve hours, then scraped carefully,<br />

leaving only the peritoneal and muscular coats. Next, they<br />

were exposed to vapor of burning brimstone and washed in<br />

soap and water, after which they were blown up to see if they<br />

could hold air. If they passed inspection, they were dried, cut<br />

to seven or eight inches, tied or sealed at one end, and bordered<br />

at the open end with a ribbon.<br />

Some condoms were made of silk<br />

that was cut, sewn, then oiled.<br />

Baudrouches were made the same way but were distinguished<br />

from ordinary condoms by undergoing further processing.<br />

This entailed drawing them smoothly and carefully<br />

onto oiled molds of appropriate size, where they were rubbed<br />

with brimstone to make them thinner. Superfine baudrouches<br />

were scented with essences, stretched on a glass mold, and<br />

rubbed with a heavy glass rod to further process them.<br />

There are actually some surviving condoms manufactured between<br />

1790 and 1810, which were found in 1953 preserved<br />

in a book in an English country manor.<br />

Probably because prostitutes were often regarded as carriers<br />

of disease, many of the surviving references to condoms<br />

come from the literature of prostitution. Houses of prostitution<br />

are known to have displayed a variety of condoms in the<br />

eighteenth century, but they also recommended the use of<br />

sponges. Sponges did not protect the customer from disease<br />

but did have some contraceptive value, and this might indicate<br />

that condoms were sometimes also used as contraceptives,<br />

as well as prophylactics.<br />

A good description of condoms appears in the writing of the<br />

eighteenth-century Frenchman Jean Astruc, who was determined<br />

to prove that syphilis originated in America, not in<br />

France:<br />

I heard from the lowest debauchees who chase<br />

without restraint after the love of prostitutes, that<br />

there are recently employed in England skins made<br />

from soft and seamless hides in the shape of a<br />

sheath, and called condoms in English, with which<br />

those about to have intercourse wrap their penis<br />

as in a coat of mail in order to render themselves<br />

safe in the dangers of an ever doubtful battle. They<br />

claim, I suppose, that thus mailed and with spears<br />

sheathed in this way, they can undergo with<br />

impunity the chances of promiscuous intercourse.<br />

But (in truth) they are greatly mistaken. [Astruc,<br />

Book ii, Chap. I, p 2]<br />

Giovanni Giacomo Casanova de Seingalt’s (1725-1799) erotic<br />

memoirs list 116 lovers by name, although they leave nameless<br />

hundreds more women and girls he had sex with, ranging<br />

in age from nine to seventy and in occupation and social status<br />

from chambermaids to noble women. He reported having<br />

intercourse standing, sitting, and lying down in coaches, on<br />

boats, in beds, and even in alleys. He also said he knew of<br />

and used condoms. Sometimes he called them the “English<br />

riding coat,” but he also referred to them as “preservative”<br />

sheaths and “assurance” caps. Casanova describes<br />

an “English overcoat” as being made<br />

of “very fine and transparent skin,” eight inches<br />

long and closed at one end, with a narrow<br />

pink ribbon slotted through the “open end” (with which to<br />

hold it up or tie it). He apparently used his sheaths not only<br />

for prophylactic purposes but to prevent his partners from<br />

becoming pregnant. He blew them up like balloons to pretest<br />

them. Some were of better quality than others, since he<br />

reported that some broke. Some were made of animal ceca,<br />

a practice he once mentioned as “suiting” himself up with a<br />

piece of dead skin.<br />

It was a common practice to use condoms over and over<br />

again, washing them out after each use. The most expensive<br />

of condoms were those known as goldbeaters’ skins. They<br />

got their name from the practice of beating gold into foil or<br />

leaf. Such sheaths were carefully processed by beating them<br />

until they were elasticized. Madame de Sévigny, writing about<br />

contraception in a 1617 letter to her daughter, described such<br />

condoms as “armor against enjoyment and a spider web<br />

against danger.” Some condoms were made of silk that was<br />

cut, sewn, then oiled. Condoms made of bladder were advertised<br />

in eighteenth-century England. The bladders might well<br />

be those of the blowfish common in the Rhine River, which<br />

were being described as early as 1788.<br />

Condoms undoubtedly existed in eighteenth-century America,<br />

but so far no historical record of them has been uncovered.<br />

It is believed that colonists probably fashioned their own con-<br />

292 EVERYTHING YOU KNOW ABOUT SEX IS <strong>WRONG</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!