12.07.2015 Views

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

gress, it <strong>to</strong>ok a series <strong>of</strong> steps <strong>to</strong> reverse the verdict <strong>on</strong> theTi<strong>to</strong> clique and thus openly <strong>to</strong>re up the 1960 Statement.10. Since November 1962 the leadership <strong>of</strong> the CPSUhas launched still fiercer attacks, <strong>on</strong> an internati<strong>on</strong>al scale,against the Chinese Communist Party and other <strong>Marx</strong>ist-Leninist Parties and whipped up a new adverse current inorder <strong>to</strong> split the socialist camp and the internati<strong>on</strong>al communistmovement. Khrushchov made <strong>on</strong>e statement afteranother and the Soviet press carried hundreds <strong>of</strong> articles attackingthe Chinese Communist Party <strong>on</strong> a whole set <strong>of</strong> issues.Directed by the leaders <strong>of</strong> the CPSU, the C<strong>on</strong>gresses <strong>of</strong> thefraternal Parties <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Italyand the Democratic Republic <strong>of</strong> Germany became stages foranti-China performances, and more than forty fraternal Partiespublished resoluti<strong>on</strong>s, statements or articles attacking theChinese Communist Party and other <strong>Marx</strong>ist-Leninist Parties.The facts cited above cannot possibly be denied by theleaders <strong>of</strong> the CPSU. These ir<strong>on</strong>-clad facts prove that the“fresh efforts” they made after the 22nd C<strong>on</strong>gress <strong>of</strong> theCPSU were aimed, not at improving Sino-Soviet relati<strong>on</strong>s andstrengthening unity between the fraternal Parties and countries,but <strong>on</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>trary, at further ganging up with the U.S.imperialists, the Indian reacti<strong>on</strong>aries and the renegade Ti<strong>to</strong>clique in order <strong>to</strong> create a wider split in the socialist campand the internati<strong>on</strong>al communist movement.In these grave circumstances, the Chinese Communist Partyhad no alternative but <strong>to</strong> make open replies <strong>to</strong> the attacks <strong>of</strong>some fraternal Parties. Between December 15, 1962 andMarch 8, 1963 we published seven such replies. In thesearticles we c<strong>on</strong>tinued <strong>to</strong> leave some leeway and did not criticizethe leadership <strong>of</strong> the CPSU by name.Despite the serious deteriorati<strong>on</strong> in Sino-Soviet relati<strong>on</strong>sresulting from the errors <strong>of</strong> the leadership <strong>of</strong> the CPSU, theChinese Communist Party agreed <strong>to</strong> send its delegati<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong>Moscow for the talks between the Chinese and Soviet Parties,and, in order that there might be a systematic exchange <strong>of</strong>97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!