12.07.2015 Views

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

y the whole people. A communist society in which severalkinds <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> the means <strong>of</strong> producti<strong>on</strong> coexist is inc<strong>on</strong>ceivable.Yet Khrushchov is creating a situati<strong>on</strong> in whichenterprises owned by the whole people are graduallydegenerating in<strong>to</strong> capitalist enterprises and farms under thesystem <strong>of</strong> collective ownership are gradually degenerating in<strong>to</strong>units <strong>of</strong> a kulak ec<strong>on</strong>omy. Again, can <strong>on</strong>e find an iota <strong>of</strong>communism in all this?Going forward <strong>to</strong> communism means moving <strong>to</strong>wards agreat abundance <strong>of</strong> social products and the realizati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> theprinciple <strong>of</strong> “from each according <strong>to</strong> his ability, <strong>to</strong> each according<strong>to</strong> his needs”. A communist society built <strong>on</strong> the enrichment<strong>of</strong> a handful <strong>of</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>s and the impoverishment <strong>of</strong>the masses is inc<strong>on</strong>ceivable. Under the socialist system thegreat Soviet people developed the social productive forces atunprecedented speed. But the evils <strong>of</strong> Khrushchov’s revisi<strong>on</strong>ismare creating havoc in the Soviet socialist ec<strong>on</strong>omy. C<strong>on</strong>stantlybeset with innumerable c<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong>s, Khrushchovmakes frequent changes in his ec<strong>on</strong>omic policies and <strong>of</strong>tengoes back <strong>on</strong> his own words, thus throwing the Soviet nati<strong>on</strong>alec<strong>on</strong>omy in<strong>to</strong> a state <strong>of</strong> chaos. Khrushchov is truly an incorrigiblewastrel. He has squandered the grain reservesbuilt up under Stalin and brought great difficulties in<strong>to</strong> thelives <strong>of</strong> the Soviet people. He has dis<strong>to</strong>rted and violated thesocialist principle <strong>of</strong> distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> “from each according <strong>to</strong>his ability, <strong>to</strong> each according <strong>to</strong> his work”, and enabled a handful<strong>of</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>s <strong>to</strong> appropriate the fruits <strong>of</strong> the labour <strong>of</strong> thebroad masses <strong>of</strong> the Soviet people. These points al<strong>on</strong>e aresufficient <strong>to</strong> prove that the road taken by Khrushchov leadsaway from communism.Going forward <strong>to</strong> communism means moving <strong>to</strong>wards enhancingthe communist c<strong>on</strong>sciousness <strong>of</strong> the masses. A communistsociety with bourgeois ideas running rampant is inc<strong>on</strong>ceivable.Yet Khrushchov is zealously reviving bourgeoisideology in the Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong> and serving as a missi<strong>on</strong>ary forthe decadent American culture. By propagating material461

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!