12.07.2015 Views

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The present correlati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> forces in the world arena gavethe socialist countries, <strong>to</strong>gether with all peace-loving forces,the opportunity <strong>of</strong> envisaging as an entirely feasible task forthe first time in his<strong>to</strong>ry that <strong>of</strong> averting a new world war and<strong>of</strong> ensuring peace and security <strong>of</strong> the peoples.The years that have passed since the adopti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> this Statementhave fully corroborated the correctness <strong>of</strong> this thesis.The failure <strong>of</strong> the aggressive forces <strong>to</strong> push mankind over theabyss <strong>of</strong> a destructive thermo-nuclear war is a highly importantresult <strong>of</strong> the strengthening <strong>of</strong> the might <strong>of</strong> the socialistcountries, <strong>of</strong> the peace-loving foreign policy which they unswervinglypursue and which is increasingly winning recogniti<strong>on</strong>and support am<strong>on</strong>g hundreds <strong>of</strong> milli<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> people andgaining the upper hand over the imperialist policy <strong>of</strong> aggressi<strong>on</strong>and war.No <strong>Marx</strong>ist doubts that imperialism, losing <strong>on</strong>e positi<strong>on</strong>after another, is trying by every means <strong>to</strong> preserve its dominati<strong>on</strong>over peoples and <strong>to</strong> regain its lost positi<strong>on</strong>s. At presentthe greatest c<strong>on</strong>spiracy ever <strong>of</strong> the internati<strong>on</strong>al imperialistsis taking place against the countries <strong>of</strong> socialism and the worldmovement <strong>of</strong> liberati<strong>on</strong>. Of course, there is no guarantee thatthe imperialists will not try <strong>to</strong> unleash a world war. TheCommunists should clearly see this danger.But the positi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the aggressor under present-day c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>sradically differs from his positi<strong>on</strong> before the Sec<strong>on</strong>dWorld War and, even more, before the First World War. Inthe past, wars usually ended with some capitalist countriesdefeating others, but the vanquished c<strong>on</strong>tinued <strong>to</strong> live, regainedtheir strength after a time, and even proved able <strong>to</strong> startrenewed aggressi<strong>on</strong>, as is shown, in particular, by the example<strong>of</strong> Germany. A thermo-nuclear war does not <strong>of</strong>fer such aprospect <strong>to</strong> any aggressor, and the imperialists are compelled<strong>to</strong> reck<strong>on</strong> with this. Fear <strong>of</strong> a retalia<strong>to</strong>ry blow, fear <strong>of</strong> retributi<strong>on</strong>,keeps them from letting loose a world war. Thesocialist community has become so str<strong>on</strong>g that imperialism canno l<strong>on</strong>ger impose its c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the peoples and dictate its504

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!