12.07.2015 Views

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

shchov’s revisi<strong>on</strong>ism is nothing but the c<strong>on</strong>tinuati<strong>on</strong> and development<strong>of</strong> Browderism and Ti<strong>to</strong>ism.Browder began <strong>to</strong> reveal his revisi<strong>on</strong>ism around 1935. Heworshipped bourgeois democracy, aband<strong>on</strong>ed making the necessarycriticisms <strong>of</strong> the bourgeois government and regardedthe dicta<strong>to</strong>rship <strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie as a fine thing for Communists,his slogan being “Communism Is Twentieth CenturyAmericanism”. 1With the formati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the internati<strong>on</strong>al and domestic antifascistunited fr<strong>on</strong>ts during World War II, he became obsessedwith bourgeois “democracy”, “progress” and “reas<strong>on</strong>”, prostratedhimself before the bourgeoisie and degenerated in<strong>to</strong> anout-and-out capitulati<strong>on</strong>ist.Browder propagated a whole set <strong>of</strong> revisi<strong>on</strong>ist views whichembellished the bourgeoisie and opposed and negated revoluti<strong>on</strong>.He declared that the Teheran Declarati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the SovietUni<strong>on</strong>, the United States and Britain ushered in an epoch <strong>of</strong>“l<strong>on</strong>g-term c<strong>on</strong>fidence and collaborati<strong>on</strong>” between capitalismand socialism and was capable <strong>of</strong> guaranteeing “a stable peacefor generati<strong>on</strong>s”. 2He spread the noti<strong>on</strong> that the internati<strong>on</strong>al agreements <strong>of</strong>the Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong>, the United States and Britain represented“the most vital interests <strong>of</strong> every nati<strong>on</strong> and every people inthe world without excepti<strong>on</strong>” 3 and that the perspective <strong>of</strong> innerchaos “is incompatible with the perspective <strong>of</strong> internati<strong>on</strong>alorder”. Therefore, it was necessary <strong>to</strong> oppose “an explosi<strong>on</strong><strong>of</strong> class c<strong>on</strong>flict” within the country and “<strong>to</strong> minimize, and<strong>to</strong> place definite limits up<strong>on</strong>” internal class struggled. 41Cited in William Foster’s His<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> the Communist Party <strong>of</strong> theUnited States, Eng. ed., Internati<strong>on</strong>al Publishers, New York, 1952, p. 337.2Earl Browder, Teheran, Our Path in War and Peace, Eng. ed., Internati<strong>on</strong>alPublishers, New York, 1944, pp. 23 and 27.3Ibid., p. 31.4Earl Browder, Teheran and America, Eng. ed., Workers LibraryPublishers, New York, 1944, pp. 17 and 28.404

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!