12.07.2015 Views

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The comrades <strong>of</strong> the delegati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Central Committee<strong>of</strong> the CPSU were unable <strong>to</strong> argue against them, but theyrepeatedly asked us <strong>to</strong> make allowances for their internalneeds, expressing the hope that the formulati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> this questi<strong>on</strong>in the draft Declarati<strong>on</strong> might show some c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>with its formulati<strong>on</strong> by the 20th C<strong>on</strong>gress <strong>of</strong> the CPSU.We had refuted the wr<strong>on</strong>g views <strong>of</strong> the leadership <strong>of</strong> theCPSU and put forward a written outline <strong>of</strong> our own views.For this reas<strong>on</strong> and for the sake <strong>of</strong> the comm<strong>on</strong> struggleagainst the enemy, the delegati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the CPC decided <strong>to</strong> meetthe repeated wishes <strong>of</strong> the comrades <strong>of</strong> the CPSU and agreed<strong>to</strong> take the draft <strong>of</strong> the Central Committee <strong>of</strong> the CPSU <strong>on</strong>this questi<strong>on</strong> as the basis, while suggesting amendments in<strong>on</strong>ly a few places.We hoped that through this debate the comrades <strong>of</strong> theCPSU would awaken <strong>to</strong> their errors and correct them. Butc<strong>on</strong>trary <strong>to</strong> our hopes, the leaders <strong>of</strong> the CPSU did not do so.At the meeting <strong>of</strong> fraternal Parties in 1960, the delegati<strong>on</strong><strong>of</strong> the CPC again engaged in repeated sharp debates with thedelegati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the CPSU <strong>on</strong> the questi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the transiti<strong>on</strong> fromcapitalism <strong>to</strong> socialism, and thoroughly exposed and criticizedKhrushchov’s revisi<strong>on</strong>ist views. During the meeting, theChinese and the Soviet sides each adhered <strong>to</strong> its own positi<strong>on</strong>,and no agreement could be reached. In view <strong>of</strong> the generalwish <strong>of</strong> fraternal Parties that a comm<strong>on</strong> document should behammered out at the meeting, the delegati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the CPCfinally made a c<strong>on</strong>cessi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> this questi<strong>on</strong> again and agreed<strong>to</strong> the verbatim transcripti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the relevant passages in the1957 Declarati<strong>on</strong> in<strong>to</strong> the 1960 Statement, again out <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>for the needs <strong>of</strong> the leaders <strong>of</strong> the CPSU. At thesame time, during this meeting we distributed the Outline <strong>of</strong>Views <strong>on</strong> the Questi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Peaceful Transiti<strong>on</strong> put forward bythe Chinese Communist Party <strong>on</strong> November 10, 1957, andmade it clear that we were giving c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong> the leadership<strong>of</strong> the CPSU <strong>on</strong> this issue for the last time, and wouldnot do so again.373

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!