12.07.2015 Views

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the then P.R.C. Ambassador <strong>to</strong> the U.S.S.R., before his departurefrom Moscow. In the course <strong>of</strong> this c<strong>on</strong>versati<strong>on</strong>, themembers <strong>of</strong> the Central Committee Presidium again <strong>to</strong>ok theinitiative in strengthening Chinese-Soviet friendship. ComradeN. S. Khrushchov asked Comrade Liu Hsiao <strong>to</strong> c<strong>on</strong>vey <strong>to</strong>Comrade <strong>Mao</strong> Tse-tung our proposal: “To set aside all disputesand differences, not <strong>to</strong> try <strong>to</strong> establish who is right and whois wr<strong>on</strong>g, not <strong>to</strong> stir up the past, but <strong>to</strong> start our relati<strong>on</strong>sfrom a clean slate.” But we did not even receive an answer<strong>to</strong> this sincere appeal.Deepening their ideological differences with the fraternalparties, the leaders <strong>of</strong> the CPC began <strong>to</strong> carry them over <strong>to</strong>governmental relati<strong>on</strong>s. Chinese government agencies begancurtailing ec<strong>on</strong>omic and trade relati<strong>on</strong>s with the Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong>and other socialist countries. On the initiative <strong>of</strong> the P.R.C.government, the volume <strong>of</strong> China’s trade with the SovietUni<strong>on</strong> was cut <strong>to</strong> nearly <strong>on</strong>e-third in the past three years;delivery <strong>of</strong> complete sets <strong>of</strong> industrial plant dropped <strong>to</strong> <strong>on</strong>efortieth<strong>of</strong> the former volume. This was d<strong>on</strong>e <strong>on</strong> the initiative<strong>of</strong> the Chinese leaders. We regret that the P.R.C. leadershiphas embarked <strong>on</strong> such a policy. Now as always, we believeit is necessary <strong>to</strong> go <strong>on</strong> developing Soviet-Chinese relati<strong>on</strong>sand extend co-operati<strong>on</strong>. This would be mutually beneficial,above all <strong>to</strong> People’s China, which has received great assistancefrom the Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong> and other socialist countries. In thepast, the Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong> developed extensive relati<strong>on</strong>s withChina, and <strong>to</strong>day, <strong>to</strong>o, it wants their expansi<strong>on</strong>, not curtailment.One would expect the CPC leadership <strong>to</strong> be the first<strong>to</strong> display c<strong>on</strong>cern for the development <strong>of</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic relati<strong>on</strong>swith the socialist countries. However, it has been acting inthe opposite directi<strong>on</strong>, disregarding the damage such acti<strong>on</strong>scause the P.R.C. ec<strong>on</strong>omy.The Chinese leaders did not tell their people the truthabout who is resp<strong>on</strong>sible for curtailing these relati<strong>on</strong>s. Extensivepropaganda aimed at discrediting the foreign anddomestic Policy <strong>of</strong> the CPSU, at stirring up anti-Soviet senti-536

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!