Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Kautskyism and social democracy, and is the advanced detachmentof the counter-revolutionary bourgeoisie.In its essence, the present-day revisionism of Khrushchovalso opposes and repudiates revolution. Therefore, the onlylogical conclusion is that Khrushchov’s revisionism is not onlycut from the same cloth as Kautskyism, but also convergeswith Trotskyism to oppose revolution. Khrushchov had betterpin the label of Trotskyism on himself.TWO DIFFERENT LINES, TWO DIFFERENT RESULTSHistory is the most telling witness. Rich experience hasbeen gained since World War II both in the international communistmovement and in the peoples’ revolutionary struggles.There has been successful as well as unsuccessful experience.Communists and the revolutionary people of all countries needto draw the right conclusions from this historical experience.The countries in Eastern Europe, Asia and Latin Americawhich have succeeded in making a socialist revolution sincethe War have done so by following the revolutionary Marxist-Leninist line and the road of the October Revolution. Now,in addition to the experience of the October Revolution, thereis the experience of the revolutions of China, the socialistcountries in Eastern Europe, Korea, Viet Nam and Cuba. Thevictorious revolutions in these countries have enriched and developedMarxism-Leninism and the experience of the OctoberRevolution.From China to Cuba, all these revolutions without exceptionwere won by armed struggle and by fighting against armed imperialistaggression and intervention.The Chinese people were victorious in their revolution afterwaging revolutionary wars for twenty-two years, includingthe three years of the People’s Liberation War, in which theythoroughly defeated the Chiang Kai-shek reactionaries whowere backed up to the hilt by U.S. imperialism.399