12.07.2015 Views

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

logical that the CPSU should carry forward the revoluti<strong>on</strong>arytraditi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Lenin and Stalin, shoulder greater resp<strong>on</strong>sibilityin supporting other fraternal Parties and countries and standin the van <strong>of</strong> the internati<strong>on</strong>al communist movement.Taking these his<strong>to</strong>rical circumstances in<strong>to</strong> account, theChinese Communist Party expressed the sincere hope thatthe Communist Party <strong>of</strong> the Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong> would shoulderthis glorious his<strong>to</strong>ric missi<strong>on</strong>. At the 1957 Moscow Meeting<strong>of</strong> the fraternal Parties, our delegati<strong>on</strong> emphasized that thesocialist camp should have the Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong> at its head. Thereas<strong>on</strong> was that, although they had committed some mistakes,“the leaders <strong>of</strong> the CPSU did finally accept the Moscow Declarati<strong>on</strong>which was unanimously adopted by the fraternalParties. Our proposal that the socialist camp should havethe Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong> at its head was written in<strong>to</strong> the Declarati<strong>on</strong>.We hold that the existence <strong>of</strong> the positi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> head does notc<strong>on</strong>tradict the principle <strong>of</strong> equality am<strong>on</strong>g fraternal Parties.It does not mean that the CPSU has any right <strong>to</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trol otherParties; what it means is that the CPSU carries greater resp<strong>on</strong>sibilityand duties <strong>on</strong> its shoulders.However, the leaders <strong>of</strong> the CPSU have not been satisfiedwith this positi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> “head”. Khrushchov complained <strong>of</strong> it<strong>on</strong> many occasi<strong>on</strong>s. He said, “What does ‘at the head’ giveus materially? It gives us neither milk nor butter, neitherpota<strong>to</strong>es nor vegetables nor flats. Perhaps it gives us somethingmorally? Nothing at all!” 1 Later he said, “What is theuse <strong>of</strong> ‘at the head’ for us? To hell with it!” 2The leaders <strong>of</strong> the CPSU say they have no desire for thepositi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> “head”, but in practice they demand the privilege<strong>of</strong> lording it over all fraternal Parties. They do not requirethemselves <strong>to</strong> stand in the van <strong>of</strong> the internati<strong>on</strong>al commu-1N. S. Khrushchov, Speech at the Banquet Given in H<strong>on</strong>our <strong>of</strong> theDelegati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the Fraternal Parties <strong>of</strong> the Socialist Countries, February4, 1960.2N. S. Khrushchov, Speech at the Meeting <strong>of</strong> the Delegates <strong>of</strong> TwelveFraternal Parties in Bucharest, June 24, 1960.335

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!