12.07.2015 Views

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1963, the speech <strong>of</strong> the head <strong>of</strong> the CPSU delegati<strong>on</strong> at theSixth C<strong>on</strong>gress <strong>of</strong> the Socialist Unity Party <strong>of</strong> Germany <strong>on</strong>January 16, 1963 and the Pravda Edi<strong>to</strong>rial Board’s article <strong>of</strong>February 10, 1963.We have also published the full text <strong>of</strong> the two letters fromthe Central Committee <strong>of</strong> the CPSU dated February 21 andMarch 30, 1963.We have replied <strong>to</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the articles and speeches inwhich fraternal Parties have attacked us, but have not yetreplied <strong>to</strong> others. For example, we have not directly replied<strong>to</strong> the many articles and speeches <strong>of</strong> the comrades <strong>of</strong> theCPSU.Between December 15, 1962 and March 8, 1963, we wroteseven articles in reply <strong>to</strong> our attackers. These articles areentitled:“Workers <strong>of</strong> All Countries, Unite, Oppose Our Comm<strong>on</strong>Enemy!”,“The Differences Between Comrade Togliatti and Us”,“Leninism and Modern Revisi<strong>on</strong>ism”,“Let Us Unite <strong>on</strong> the Basis <strong>of</strong> the Moscow Declarati<strong>on</strong> andthe Moscow Statement”,“Whence the Differences? — A Reply <strong>to</strong> Thorez and OtherComrades”,“More <strong>on</strong> the Differences Between Comrade Togliatti andUs — Some Important Problems <strong>of</strong> Leninism in the C<strong>on</strong>temporaryWorld”,“A Comment <strong>on</strong> the Statement <strong>of</strong> the Communist Party <strong>of</strong>the U.S.A.”.Presumably, you are referring <strong>to</strong> these articles when <strong>to</strong>wardsthe end <strong>of</strong> your letter <strong>of</strong> March 30 you accuse theChinese press <strong>of</strong> making “groundless attacks” <strong>on</strong> the CPSU.It is turning things upside down <strong>to</strong> describe articles replying<strong>to</strong> our attackers as “attacks”.Since you describe our articles as “groundless” and as sovery bad, why do you not publish all seven <strong>of</strong> these “groundlessattacks”, in the same way as we have published your51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!