12.07.2015 Views

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

aggressi<strong>on</strong> against Cuba. It was amply clear <strong>to</strong> us that <strong>to</strong>rebuff aggressi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>to</strong> defend the Cuban revoluti<strong>on</strong> effectively,would require the most resolute measures. Imprecati<strong>on</strong>s andwarnings — even if they are called “serious warnings” andare repeated 250 times — have no effect <strong>on</strong> the imperialists.Proceeding from the need <strong>to</strong> defend the Cuban revoluti<strong>on</strong>,the Soviet government and the government <strong>of</strong> Cuba reachedagreement <strong>on</strong> the stati<strong>on</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> missiles <strong>on</strong> Cuba, since thiswas the <strong>on</strong>ly realistic means <strong>of</strong> preventing American imperialistaggressi<strong>on</strong>. The delivery <strong>of</strong> missiles <strong>to</strong> Cuba signifiedthat an attack <strong>on</strong> her would meet with a resolute rebuff, withthe employment <strong>of</strong> rocket weap<strong>on</strong>s against the organizers <strong>of</strong>the aggressi<strong>on</strong>. This resolute step <strong>on</strong> the part <strong>of</strong> the SovietUni<strong>on</strong> and Cuba came as a shock <strong>to</strong> the American imperialists— for the first time in his<strong>to</strong>ry they were made <strong>to</strong> feel that anarmed attack <strong>on</strong> Cuba would be answered by a smashing blowat their own terri<strong>to</strong>ry.Inasmuch as it was not merely a c<strong>on</strong>flict between the UnitedStates and Cuba, but a clash between the two major nuclearpowers, the Caribbean crisis would have developed in<strong>to</strong> aworld crisis. There was a real danger <strong>of</strong> world therm<strong>on</strong>uclearwar.There were two possibilities in the prevailing situati<strong>on</strong>:either <strong>to</strong> fall in with the “wildmen” (the appellati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> themost aggressive and reacti<strong>on</strong>ary representatives <strong>of</strong> Americanimperialism) and follow a path that would unleash a worldtherm<strong>on</strong>uclear war, or, using the opportunities <strong>of</strong>fered by thedelivery <strong>of</strong> missiles, <strong>to</strong> take all measures <strong>to</strong> reach agreement<strong>on</strong> peaceful settlement <strong>of</strong> the crisis and prevent aggressi<strong>on</strong>against the Cuban Republic.We chose, as is known, the sec<strong>on</strong>d path and we are c<strong>on</strong>vincedthat we acted rightly. We are c<strong>on</strong>fident that this is theunanimous view <strong>of</strong> our people. The Soviet people have <strong>on</strong>more than <strong>on</strong>e occasi<strong>on</strong> dem<strong>on</strong>strated their ability <strong>to</strong> standup for themselves, defend the cause <strong>of</strong> the revoluti<strong>on</strong>, thecause <strong>of</strong> socialism. And no <strong>on</strong>e knows better than they how548

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!