12.07.2015 Views

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ut <strong>to</strong> turn <strong>to</strong> abuse.” 1 The attitude shown by the CentralCommittee <strong>of</strong> the CPSU in its Open Letter is exactly like that<strong>of</strong> the Mensheviks.Even though the Open Letter resorts <strong>to</strong> abuse in place <strong>of</strong>debate, we <strong>on</strong> our part prefer <strong>to</strong> reply <strong>to</strong> it with principledarguments and a great many facts.The great Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong> was the first state <strong>of</strong> the dicta<strong>to</strong>rship<strong>of</strong> the proletariat. In the beginning, the foremost leader <strong>of</strong>the Party and the Government in this state was Lenin. AfterLenin’s death, it was Stalin.After Lenin’s death, Stalin became not <strong>on</strong>ly the leader <strong>of</strong>the Party and Government <strong>of</strong> the Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong> but theacknowledged leader <strong>of</strong> the internati<strong>on</strong>al communist movementas well.It is <strong>on</strong>ly forty-six years since the first socialist state wasinaugurated by the Oc<strong>to</strong>ber Revoluti<strong>on</strong>. For nearly thirty<strong>of</strong> these years Stalin was the foremost leader <strong>of</strong> this state.Whether in the his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> the dicta<strong>to</strong>rship <strong>of</strong> the proletaria<strong>to</strong>r in that <strong>of</strong> the internati<strong>on</strong>al communist movement, Stalin’sactivities occupy an extremely important place.The Chinese Communist Party has c<strong>on</strong>sistently maintainedthat the questi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> how <strong>to</strong> evaluate Stalin and what attitude<strong>to</strong> take <strong>to</strong>wards him is not just <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> appraising Stalin himself;more important, it is a questi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> how <strong>to</strong> sum up thehis<strong>to</strong>rical experience <strong>of</strong> the dicta<strong>to</strong>rship <strong>of</strong> the proletariat and<strong>of</strong>the internati<strong>on</strong>al communist movement since Lenin’s death.Comrade Khrushchov completely negated Stalin at the 20thC<strong>on</strong>gress <strong>of</strong> the CPSU. He failed <strong>to</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sult the fraternal Partiesin advance <strong>on</strong> this questi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> principle which involvesthe whole internati<strong>on</strong>al communist movement, and afterwardstried <strong>to</strong> impose a fait accompli <strong>on</strong> them. Whoever makes anappraisal <strong>of</strong> Stalin different from that <strong>of</strong> the leadership <strong>of</strong>the CPSU is charged with “defence <strong>of</strong> the pers<strong>on</strong>ality cult”as well as “interference” in the internal affairs <strong>of</strong> the CPSU.1V. I. Lenin, “Some Remarks <strong>on</strong> the ‘Reply’ by P. Maslov”, CollectedWorks, Eng. ed., FLPH, Moscow, 1963, Vol. XV, p. 255.118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!