12.07.2015 Views

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

Polemic on General Line of International ... - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Leninist teachings c<strong>on</strong>cerning the proletarian revoluti<strong>on</strong> andthe dicta<strong>to</strong>rship <strong>of</strong> the proletariat.Communists would always prefer <strong>to</strong> bring about the transiti<strong>on</strong><strong>to</strong> socialism by peaceful means. But can peaceful transiti<strong>on</strong>be made in<strong>to</strong> a new world-wide strategic principle forthe internati<strong>on</strong>al communist movement? Absolutely not.<strong>Marx</strong>ism-Leninism c<strong>on</strong>sistently holds that the fundamentalquesti<strong>on</strong> in all revoluti<strong>on</strong>s is that <strong>of</strong> state power. The 1957Declarati<strong>on</strong> and the 1960 Statement both clearly point out,“Leninism teaches, and experience c<strong>on</strong>firms, that the rulingclasses never relinquish power voluntarily.” The old governmentnever <strong>to</strong>pples even in a period <strong>of</strong> crisis, unless it ispushed. This is a universal law <strong>of</strong> class struggle.In specific his<strong>to</strong>rical c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>Marx</strong> and Lenin did raisethe possibility that revoluti<strong>on</strong> may develop peacefully. But,as Lenin pointed out, the peaceful development <strong>of</strong> revoluti<strong>on</strong>is an opportunity “very seldom <strong>to</strong> be met with in the his<strong>to</strong>ry<strong>of</strong> revoluti<strong>on</strong>s”.As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, there is no his<strong>to</strong>rical precedent forpeaceful transiti<strong>on</strong> from capitalism <strong>to</strong> socialism.Certain pers<strong>on</strong>s say there was no precedent when <strong>Marx</strong>fore<strong>to</strong>ld that socialism would inevitably replace capitalism.Then why can we not predict a peaceful transiti<strong>on</strong> fromcapitalism <strong>to</strong> socialism despite the absence <strong>of</strong> a precedent?This parallel is absurd. Employing dialectical and his<strong>to</strong>ricalmaterialism, <strong>Marx</strong> analysed the c<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> capitalism,discovered the objective laws <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> human societyand arrived at a scientific c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>, whereas theprophets who pin all their hopes <strong>on</strong> “peaceful transiti<strong>on</strong>” proceedfrom his<strong>to</strong>rical idealism, ignore the most fundamentalc<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> capitalism, repudiate the <strong>Marx</strong>ist-Leninistteachings <strong>on</strong> class struggle, and arrive at a subjective andgroundless c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>. How can people who repudiate <strong>Marx</strong>ismget any help from <strong>Marx</strong>?It is plain <strong>to</strong> every<strong>on</strong>e that the capitalist countries arestrengthening their state machinery — and especially their20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!