21.01.2013 Views

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MICROSCOPICAL INVESTIGATION. 363<br />

had admitted independent irritability only for the muscular<br />

tissue of the heart and intestine. It was established<br />

by experiments on frogs and tortoises that power of<br />

movement exists after removal of the brain. STENO drew<br />

attention to the part played by the blood in muscular<br />

action; he ligatured the descending aorta in the frog, and<br />

showed that paralysis of the muscles of the posterior part<br />

of the body ensues. BAGLIVI also sought for the cause of<br />

the inherent contractility of muscular tissue in the blood,<br />

and considered the nerves to be only the exciters of move­<br />

ment; and he made on this occasion certain remarks which<br />

may be taken as alluding to the distinction between plain<br />

and transversely striated muscular fibres* MAYOW, on<br />

the other hand, attached great importance to the influence<br />

of the atmospheric air upon the activity of muscle. GLISSON<br />

regarded irritability as a propertyf belonging to matter in<br />

general; WlLLlS considered it to belong only to muscles.<br />

Afterwards A. HALLER, as the result of a great number<br />

of researches and vivisections, established on a firm basis<br />

the different degrees of sensibility and irritability possessed<br />

by the various tissues and organs of the body. He came<br />

to the conclusion that sensibility is associated with the<br />

existence of nerves and irritability with that of muscular<br />

tissue.<br />

The nerves were held to be filled with a fluid, and<br />

GLISSON even spoke of currents flowing to and fro in<br />

nerves. Clearly, these have only the name in common<br />

with those electrical currents which at the present day are<br />

known to manifest themselves in nerves. In the explana­<br />

tion of the action of nerve force the Iatrophysicists and<br />

the Iatrochemists were opposed to one another ; for while<br />

the former, with NEWTON, assumed the presence of vibra­<br />

tions, of tensions, and relaxations, the latter considered<br />

* G. BAGLIVI: De fibra motrice et morbosa in his Opera omnia medicopract.<br />

et anatom., Antwerpen 1719.<br />

f GLISSON: De ventriculo et intestinis, Amstelod. 1677, p. 168 et seq.<br />

according to G. H. MEYER in HAESER'S Archiv, Jena 1843, v > P- 1 et seq.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!