21.01.2013 Views

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE NATURAL SCIENCES. 445<br />

diligently worked at, and afforded material for the solution<br />

of many questions of geology and anthropology.<br />

In botany various attempts were made to discover a<br />

natural system of plants. ADANSON declared that " nature<br />

everywhere exhibits to us natural groupings," and was of<br />

opinion that classification should not certainly be based<br />

upon the similarities and differences of one particular<br />

organ, but only upon the collective phenomena and<br />

characteristics of the organism. In order to reveal this<br />

system he compared individual plants in respect of their<br />

various organs and arranged them into classes of varying<br />

degrees of affinity according to the greater or less correspondence<br />

between them. His method of classification was,<br />

above all things, wanting in lucidity, and could not, therefore,<br />

gain for itself any approval.<br />

A more correct method was introduced by A. L. DE<br />

JUSSIEU, A. PYRAMUS DE CANDOLLE, ROBERT BROWN and<br />

others: they insisted first of all upon an accurate definition<br />

and delimitation of the families of plants, and did a quantity<br />

of valuable preparatory work in this direction. A. P DE<br />

CANDOLLE, who himself described with great care more than<br />

one hundred families, founded the doctrine of the symmetry<br />

of the plant-form. The investigations of J. GAERTNER<br />

upon the fruits and seeds of plants and R. BROWN'S monographs<br />

were of fundamental importance for morphology.<br />

GOETHE'S doctrine of metamorphosis excited the attention<br />

of philosophers of nature rather than that of men of<br />

science. It was of a confused and indefinite character, and<br />

was first explained scientifically by ALEXANDER BRAUN<br />

who brought forward valuable information upon the form<br />

of the leaf and the development of the plant.* The<br />

anatomy of plants was diligently worked at by BRISSEAU-<br />

MIRBEL, the younger MOLDENHAWER, LINK, MEYEN, HUGO<br />

MOHL and others, who succeeded in giving definiteness to<br />

men's views upon the structure of plants. Their micro-<br />

* WIGAND: Geschichte und Kritik der Lehre von der Metamorphose der<br />

Pflanzen, Leipzig 1846.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!