21.01.2013 Views

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY 471<br />

trigeminus, the analogy of which with the spinal nerves<br />

had already been noticed by SOEMMERING and PROCHASKA.<br />

MAGENDIE, and JOHANNES MULLER in a greater degree<br />

still, confirmed BELL'S discovery by convincing experiments.<br />

The doctrine of reflex movement already advanced by<br />

DESCARTES, and plainly enunciated by PROCHASKA, to<br />

which MARSHALL HALL, in 1833, gave a scientific founda­<br />

tion by his observations, and which JOHANNES MULLER<br />

corrected in certain points and demonstrated in a clear,<br />

intelligible manner, now constituted a recognized addition<br />

to science. The functions of the several nerves and the<br />

significance of the different nervous formations, as of<br />

ganglia, for instance, were determined by experiment. Even<br />

a solution of the difficult problems offered in the physiology<br />

of the central nervous system was attempted.<br />

F J. GALL thought that in examining and comparing the<br />

skulls of persons, possessed of definite peculiarities of<br />

intellect or character, he had observed that certain localities<br />

were more prominent than others. Adhering to the old<br />

theory that the faculties of the mind are definitely localized<br />

he inferred that intellectual centres are accurately mapped<br />

out in the brain and can be recognized by the increased<br />

vaulting of the cranial surface at particular spots.<br />

Although he was anxious to support this hypothesis by<br />

anatomical investigations, speculation really had a pre­<br />

ponderating influence. His method of localizing and dis­<br />

tributing the faculties of the mind was an arbitrary one,<br />

and his assumption that such give any characteristic<br />

indications upon the surface of the skull was an entirely<br />

erroneous one. For all this, he must be credited with<br />

having rendered the service of advancing the anatomical<br />

investigation of the brain and of stimulating men to a<br />

scientific study of the skull, a subject undertaken with<br />

great success by C G. CARUS, HUSCHKE, and others.<br />

It was reserved for the improved methods of research of<br />

modern times to throw some light into the dark places of<br />

cerebral physiology. By the help of these it became

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!