21.01.2013 Views

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ENGLAND.—NORTH AMERICA.<br />

501<br />

where such was obtained : it permitted everyone to practise<br />

medicine and left it to the public to distinguish the good<br />

practitioners from the bad. Under these circumstances<br />

success naturally became the final court of appeal. The<br />

•quacks mistrusting a judgment which offered them so little<br />

security, endeavoured by means of testimonials, in which<br />

•their medical studies and their professional ability were set<br />

forth, to court the popular favour. Various doctors' guilds<br />

and medical schools were prepared to give such testimonials<br />

upon payment of fees, and held examinations, which,<br />

however, were neither arranged on any uniform plan nor<br />

supervised by any central authority, and consequently<br />

gave no guarantee .whatever of the training of the medical<br />

practitioner. Many got diplomas in foreign countries or<br />

endeavoured to procure them by illegal methods; the Arch­<br />

bishop of Canterbury had * also the right of conferring the<br />

degree of Doctor of Medicine. It went so far at last that<br />

it was sufficient for anyone to.be recognized as a doctor<br />

if he were presented as such to the authorities bv two<br />

members of a medical guild.<br />

Such a state of things must have resulted in serious dis­<br />

advantages to the patients upon whom these practitioners<br />

were "let loose." The imperturbable equanimity of the<br />

English people was at length shaken, and Parliament was<br />

induced to find a remedy. The result of its deliberations<br />

was the Medical Act of 1858, in which it was accurately<br />

defined what Corporations should thenceforth have the<br />

right to hold examinations and grant certificates which<br />

should be recognized as valid. These examinations were<br />

rendered subject to the supervision of the General Council<br />

of Medical Education and Registration of the United King­<br />

dom, which body has to take care that the examinations<br />

are conformable to the end in view. Should this not be<br />

the case in any particular instance the General Council<br />

has authority to order a change of examiners, or, if the<br />

cause of complaint is not removed, to take away the<br />

: this is still a prerogative of the See of Canterbury.—E. H. H.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!