21.01.2013 Views

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

0"T' LAERT> "! - USP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE TIME OF HIPPOKRATES.,<br />

to die must also have attracted their attention. So too<br />

may the glimpses into the structure of the body afforded by<br />

external wounds have been not without result. Various<br />

accounts point to the fact that there was no shrinking with<br />

horror from opening and examining the human body*<br />

Even if no scientific aims were pursued in these investigations,<br />

evidence is nevertheless afforded that anatomical investigations<br />

were possible. That these were actually undertaken<br />

is an assumption of great probability in consequence of<br />

certain remarks of ARISTOTLE and the Hippokratic writers<br />

and above all in view of the extent of the anatomical knowledge<br />

of that period. The author of the Hippokratic<br />

treatise "on the joints" says incidentally of dislocation of<br />

the spine that it is permitted in the dead, but not in the<br />

living, to open the body by incision in order to reduce the<br />

dislocation by the hand, and in the lecture " on the Heart "<br />

the statement is made that this organ is to be withdrawn<br />

from the body of a dead person for the purpose of examination<br />

in the manner customary for a long time previously.t<br />

A passage in the 5th book of the Epidemics speaks indeed<br />

of a dissection which was undertaken for the purpose of<br />

determining the origin and extent of a disease.^ Speaking<br />

generally they appear to have confined themselves to<br />

opening the thoracic and abdominal cavities; and the<br />

position and form of the contained organs are fairly<br />

correctly described. ARISTOTLE who on various occasions<br />

drew comparisons between the structure of the human body<br />

and that of the lower animals declared that the internal<br />

organs of man were as yet but little known.§ Certainly,<br />

the knowledge possessed by the doctors, of the Hippokratic<br />

period, of the brain, nerves, vessels and even muscles was<br />

scanty and deficient. On the other hand, the bones were<br />

* PLINIUS: Hist. Nat, xi, 70.—VALER. MAXIM, i, 8, 15.—PAUSANIAS iv, 9.<br />

—HEHODOT. ix, 83.<br />

f HIPPOKRATES op. tit. T. iv, 198. vi, 16. ix, 88.—GALEN ii, 280.<br />

X HIPPOKRATES op. cit. T. v, 224.—ARISTOTLE : de part, anim : iv, 2.<br />

§ ARISTOTLE: Hist. anim. i, 16.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!