LAS RAZONES DEL DERECHO Teo rías de la ar gu men ta ción ju rí di ca
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
234 BIBLIOGRAFÍA<br />
———, A<strong>ar</strong>nio, Perelman und Wittgenstein. Einige Bemerkingen zu Aulis<br />
A<strong>ar</strong>nios Begriff <strong>de</strong>r Rationalität <strong>de</strong>r <strong>ju</strong>ristischen Ar<strong>gu</strong><strong>men</strong><strong>ta</strong>tion, Peczenik,<br />
A., Uusi<strong>ta</strong>lo, J. (eds.), Reasoning on Legal Reasoning, Vamma<strong>la</strong><br />
(Fin<strong>la</strong>n<strong>di</strong>a), 1979c, pp. 121-137.<br />
———, “Die logische Analyse <strong>ju</strong>ristischer Entscheidungen”, A.R.S.P.,<br />
Nueva Serie, Cua<strong>de</strong>rno 14, 1980a, pp. 181-212.<br />
———, “ Teleologische Ausle<strong>gu</strong>ng und Gesetzesbindung” , Locumer<br />
Protokolle, núm. 31, 1980b, pp. 143-151.<br />
———, recensión <strong>de</strong> MacCormick, N., “ Legal Reasoning and Legal<br />
Theory”, Rechtstheorie, num. 11, cua<strong>de</strong>rno 1, 1980b, pp. 120-128.<br />
———, “Juristische <strong>ar</strong><strong>gu</strong><strong>men</strong><strong>ta</strong>tion und praktische Vernunft”, Jahrbuch<br />
<strong>de</strong>r Aka<strong>de</strong>mie <strong>de</strong>r Wissenschaften in Göttingen, 1982, pp. 29-32.<br />
———, Theorie <strong>de</strong>r Grucrechte, Ba<strong>de</strong>n-Ba<strong>de</strong>n, 1985a, 2a. ed., Frankfurt<br />
a. M., Shurkamp, 1986.<br />
———, “La I<strong>de</strong>a <strong>de</strong> una <strong>Teo</strong><strong>rí</strong>a Procesal <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong> Ar<strong>gu</strong><strong>men</strong><strong>ta</strong><strong>ción</strong> Ju<strong>rí</strong><strong>di</strong><strong>ca</strong>”,<br />
G<strong>ar</strong>zón Valdés, E. (ed.), Derecho y filosofía, B<strong>ar</strong>celona-C<strong>ar</strong><strong>ca</strong>s, Alfa,<br />
1985b, pp. 43-57. La ed. alemana, “Die I<strong>de</strong>e einer prozeduralen Theorie<br />
<strong>de</strong>r <strong>ju</strong>ristischen Ar<strong>gu</strong><strong>men</strong><strong>ta</strong>tion”, Rechtstheorie, cua<strong>de</strong>rno 2, 1981,<br />
pp. 177-188.<br />
———, “Rechtsregeln und Rechtsprinzipien”, A.R.S.P., Nueva Serie,<br />
cua<strong>de</strong>rno 25, 1985c, pp. 13-29.<br />
———, “ Ermessensfehler”, Juristen Zeitung, 15 agosto <strong>de</strong> 1986, pp.<br />
701-768.<br />
———, “Ar<strong>gu</strong><strong>men</strong><strong>ta</strong>tion, Ar<strong>gu</strong><strong>men</strong><strong>ta</strong>tionstheorie”, Ergänzb<strong>ar</strong>es Lexikon<br />
<strong>de</strong>s Rechts, 2-30, 1987a, pp. 1-4.<br />
———, “ Rechtssystem und praktische Vernunft”, Rechstheorie, núm.<br />
18, 1987b, pp. 405-419.<br />
———, “Legal Expert Systems and Legal Theory”, en Fiedler, H. et al.<br />
(eds.), Expert Systems in Law. Impacts on Legal Theory and Computer<br />
Law, Tübingen, 1988a, pp. 67-74.<br />
———, “Problems of <strong>di</strong>scourse Theory”, C<strong>rí</strong>ti<strong>ca</strong>, núm. 20, 1988b, pp.<br />
43-64. Se ci<strong>ta</strong> por <strong>la</strong> traduc<strong>ción</strong> <strong>ca</strong>stel<strong>la</strong>na, Problemas <strong>de</strong> <strong>la</strong> teo<strong>rí</strong>a <strong>de</strong>l<br />
<strong>di</strong>scurso, Buenos Aires, Universidad <strong>de</strong> Córdoba, Ac<strong>ta</strong>s <strong>de</strong>l Congreso<br />
Internacional <strong>de</strong> Filosofía, 1988, pp. 59-70.<br />
———, “Idée et Structure d’un Systéme du Droit Rationnel”, Archives<br />
<strong>de</strong> Philosophie du Droit, núm. 33, 1988c, pp. 22-38.<br />
———, “ Sistema Ju<strong>rí</strong><strong>di</strong>co, Principios Ju<strong>rí</strong><strong>di</strong>cos y Razón Prácti<strong>ca</strong>” ,<br />
Doxa, núm. 5, 1988d.
Change language