01.03.2013 Views

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(3) Workers having a fixed place <strong>of</strong> employment who are sent on errands or special<br />

missions by the employer; and<br />

(4) Workers who perform services at home for their employer.<br />

b. In these cases, the CE must determine whether at the time <strong>of</strong> the injury the employee:<br />

(1) Was performing assigned duties,<br />

(2) Was engaged in an activity which was a reasonable incident <strong>of</strong> the assignment, or<br />

(3) Had deviated from the assignment and was engaged in a personal activity which was<br />

not related to the work. The general principles for deciding these cases differ because the<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> the premises rule does not exist for <strong>of</strong>f-premises injuries. Furthermore, there<br />

is a difference in the application <strong>of</strong> these principles among the several kinds <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-premises<br />

injuries.<br />

c. Workers Such as Messengers, <strong>Letter</strong> <strong>Carriers</strong>, and Chauffeurs.<br />

(1) By the nature <strong>of</strong> their work, employees in this category are on the premises <strong>of</strong> the<br />

employer for only part <strong>of</strong> each working day and it follows that many <strong>of</strong> their injuries are<br />

sustained away from the industrial premises. Of course, claims for these employees when<br />

injured on the premises will be examined and adjudicated in accordance with the principles<br />

for all on-premises injuries. The <strong>of</strong>f-premises injuries will require somewhat different<br />

consideration.<br />

(2) For the <strong>of</strong>f-premises injuries <strong>of</strong> these employees, it is neither necessary nor<br />

practicable to develop the evidence in all cases as fully as is required for the injuries<br />

sustained by other kinds <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-premises workers. No additional evidence is needed if the<br />

CE can reasonably conclude from the evidence on the notice <strong>of</strong> injury combined with other<br />

material in the file that the employee was performing assigned duties when the injury<br />

occurred.<br />

(3) If it appears questionable that the employee was in the course <strong>of</strong> employment when<br />

injured, the <strong>of</strong>ficial superior should be asked to submit:<br />

(a) A statement with full explanation showing specifically whether the employee<br />

was in the performance <strong>of</strong> duty when the injury occurred, and whether at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

injury the employee had deviated from the proper route for personal reasons; and<br />

(b) A diagram showing the location <strong>of</strong> the accident in relation to the route <strong>of</strong><br />

travel the employee was to follow to perform the assigned duty.<br />

(4) In most cases, the evidence should be sufficient to adjudicate the claim. If not,<br />

supplemental statements should be obtained from the <strong>of</strong>ficial superior, co-workers, or other<br />

possible witnesses, and in disability cases, from the injured employee.<br />

<strong>FECA</strong>-<strong>PT2</strong> Printed: 06/08/2010 172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!