01.03.2013 Views

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

premises and, if not, this should be explained.<br />

d. The need for additional statements from co-workers, witnesses, or other sources will be<br />

determined by the circumstances <strong>of</strong> the case, the discrepancies in the evidence, or other matters<br />

requiring clarification.<br />

2-0804-9 Idiopathic Falls<br />

9. Idiopathic Falls.<br />

a. The CE should give particular attention to those cases where the injury is due to a fall which<br />

may have been caused by a personal and non-occupational pathology, such as a myocardial<br />

infarction, fainting spell, or epileptic seizure. Injuries caused by such conditions are excluded from<br />

coverage under the <strong>FECA</strong> unless there is intervention or contribution by some hazard or special<br />

condition <strong>of</strong> the employment, including normal furnishings <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fice or other workplace.<br />

b. In such cases it is the CE's responsibility to obtain appropriate evidence from the injured<br />

employee, the immediate superior, the witnesses, and the attending physician, showing whether<br />

the fall was due to an idiopathic condition or an unknown cause. If the incident was due to an<br />

idiopathic condition, the record must also clearly show whether the fall was to the immediate<br />

supporting surface (floor) or whether some special condition, hazard, or instrumentality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

work contributed to or intervened as a cause <strong>of</strong> the injury. If some factor <strong>of</strong> the employment<br />

intervened or contributed to the injury resulting from the fall, the employee has coverage under<br />

the <strong>FECA</strong> for the results <strong>of</strong> the injury but not for the idiopathic condition which caused the fall.<br />

c. A distinction must be made between idiopathic falls and those falls which are merely<br />

unexplained. If a fall is not shown to be caused by an idiopathic condition, it is simply unexplained<br />

and is therefore compensable if it occurred in the performance <strong>of</strong> duty. An idiopathic fall is one<br />

where a personal, non-occupational pathology causes an employee to collapse. An unexplained fall<br />

is one where the cause is unknown even to the employee.<br />

The ECAB made the distinction between idiopathic and unexplained falls in the following two cases:<br />

<strong>FECA</strong>-<strong>PT2</strong> Printed: 06/08/2010 180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!