01.03.2013 Views

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

over $10,000, and that amount must be returned to the Government. See Minne B. Lewis,<br />

53 ECAB 606 (2002) (ECAB upheld OWCP’s repayment provisions as they “prevent unjust<br />

enrichment.” ECAB stated that without them a claimant who has received a Government<br />

subsidy to purchase property could turn a quick pr<strong>of</strong>it by simply selling the property. OWCP<br />

procedures requiring reimbursement to the government attempt to return the claimant,<br />

after the property is relinquished, to substantially the same position he or she enjoyed<br />

previously.)<br />

For example, if an elevator is installed in the claimant's house and the house is later sold,<br />

the OWCP should be reimbursed from the proceeds <strong>of</strong> the sale for the current value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

elevator, if it exceeds $10,000 after applying the sliding scale. The current value may be<br />

determined in any reasonable, equitable manner, such as estimates from real estate<br />

sources, bank appraisers, or by comparing recent sale prices <strong>of</strong> similar houses without the<br />

special equipment.<br />

A sliding scale is used to determine the remaining enhanced value at the time the house or<br />

housing modification is relinquished or no longer needed by the claimant. The amount <strong>of</strong><br />

reimbursement due to the Government will be reduced gradually. If the claimant leaves the<br />

modified home after one year <strong>of</strong> residence, the amount <strong>of</strong> reimbursement due the<br />

Government would be 90% <strong>of</strong> the total disbursements made for the purchase and/or<br />

housing modifications. After two years <strong>of</strong> residence in the modified home, the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

the reimbursement to be sought by OWCP would be 80% <strong>of</strong> the disbursements. The<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> the reimbursement due the Government would continue to reduce annually, with<br />

a reduction to zero after ten years <strong>of</strong> residency has elapsed.<br />

While some modifications may decrease rather than increase the value <strong>of</strong> a home, no<br />

reimbursement to the claimant can be made for any reduction in the value <strong>of</strong> the house<br />

resulting from modifications which may inconvenience prospective purchasers.<br />

(15) The claimant (and authorized representative if applicable) should be notified <strong>of</strong> these<br />

reimbursement requirements and should sign an acknowledgment <strong>of</strong> these reimbursement<br />

responsibilities. See Exhibit 2.<br />

(16) If a house has been modified, the claimant must notify OWCP before any move<br />

which may result in a claim for further housing modifications. A claimant who sells a<br />

modified house is liable for modifying any future residence absent a claims-related reason<br />

for the move and prior OWCP approval (see paragraph 10 below).<br />

b. Technical Development. If medical eligibility has been satisfied, the claimant should be<br />

advised <strong>of</strong> the criteria mentioned in this section. Specifically, The claimant should be advised that<br />

proposed housing modifications should be <strong>of</strong> a quality and finish level consistent with his or her<br />

present residence but not superior to it. (For example, builder grade cabinets will be replaced with<br />

similar cabinets, not expensive custom cabinets). Likewise, proposals should mention the type <strong>of</strong><br />

materials being used rather than concentrating on a specific brand name. The most cost-effective<br />

means <strong>of</strong> accomplishing the modification should be provided in the proposal. The claimant should<br />

also be advised that if it is established that it is not structurally feasible to modify the present<br />

<strong>FECA</strong>-<strong>PT2</strong> Printed: 06/08/2010 723

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!