01.03.2013 Views

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

termination <strong>of</strong> compensation where the claimant voluntarily retired two and a half years<br />

after he returned to work, and there was no evidence to indicate that he retired because <strong>of</strong><br />

disability or health reasons). See Stephen R. Lubin, 43 ECAB 564 (1992) (ECAB noted that<br />

the employee's election to receive retirement benefits was not a valid reason for refusing an<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> suitable work). See also B.C., Docket No. 08-1274 (issued May 11, 2009) (“To the<br />

extent that appellant refused the position because she was pursuing a disability retirement,<br />

the Board notes that retirement is not an acceptable reason for refusing an <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> suitable<br />

work.”).<br />

(2) Where the claimant resigned a modified light-duty position without good reason. See<br />

Arquelio Pacheco, 40 ECAB 277. See also Jerry Inman, Docket No. 03-476 (issued April 24,<br />

2003) (The claimant alleged that coworkers had treated him poorly when he returned to the<br />

previous light-duty position and that the employing establishment failed to provide him with<br />

information regarding his status in the event <strong>of</strong> a reduction-in-force. ECAB held that issues<br />

<strong>of</strong> job security were not acceptable reasons for refusing an <strong>of</strong>fered position.).<br />

(3) Where the claimant resigned from his limited-duty position "because it was going<br />

nowhere" and he preferred to go back to college. See James E. Kale, Docket No. 88-2031,<br />

issued May 22, 1991. See also Donald A. Reynolds, Docket No. 00-2682, (issued August 17,<br />

2001) (At the time <strong>of</strong> his work stoppage, appellant indicated that he was resigning his<br />

position because he desired to finish his degree).<br />

b. Claimant's Response.<br />

(1) If the claimant returns to work, a formal decision determining LWEC should be made<br />

after 60 days <strong>of</strong> reemployment.<br />

(2) If no reply is received from the claimant, the CE should prepare a formal decision<br />

which terminates any further compensation for wage loss (effective as <strong>of</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> the roll<br />

period), as well as compensation for permanent partial impairment to a schedule member,<br />

under Section 8106(c)(2) <strong>of</strong> the Act. The claimant's entitlement to payment <strong>of</strong> medical<br />

expenses for treatment <strong>of</strong> the accepted condition is not terminated.<br />

(3) If the claimant provides reasons for ceasing employment which do not constitute a<br />

claim for recurrence (see paragraph 9 b(1) above), the CE must evaluate the reasons given.<br />

c. Acceptable Reasons for Abandonment. Reasons which the CE may accept include (but are<br />

not limited to):<br />

(1) The claimant found other work which fairly and reasonably represents his or her<br />

earning capacity (in which case compensation would be adjusted or terminated based on<br />

actual earnings).<br />

(2) A subsequent medical condition prevents the claimant from continuing to perform<br />

the job.<br />

<strong>FECA</strong>-<strong>PT2</strong> Printed: 06/08/2010 448

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!