01.03.2013 Views

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(3) Neither wage-loss compensation nor payment for medical expenses is claimed at<br />

present.<br />

In these instances, the CE should file down the form and remove the disability tracking record from<br />

the automated system. The CE should note on the form or in a short memo to file why no action is<br />

being taken.<br />

d. Advising the Employing Agency. Whether or not the employee is still employed by the<br />

Federal agency for which he or she worked at the time <strong>of</strong> injury, or is carried on its rolls, the<br />

Claims Examiner (CE) must provide the agency with copies <strong>of</strong> any correspondence about a claim<br />

for recurrence.<br />

e. Authorizing Benefits. Generally, neither medical treatment nor compensation should be<br />

authorized unless the record contains Form CA-2a with supporting information. The CE may<br />

authorize an emergency medical examination, however, without waiting for a Form CA-2a.<br />

2-1500-5 Recurrence <strong>of</strong> Medical Condition<br />

5. Recurrence <strong>of</strong> Medical Condition. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paragraph is to address the evidence needed<br />

to adjudicate claims for recurrent medical care.<br />

a. Within 90 Days <strong>of</strong> Release from Medical Care (as stated by the physician or computed from<br />

the date <strong>of</strong> last examination or the physician's instruction to return PRN). The CE may accept the<br />

attending physician's statement supporting causal relationship between the claimant's current<br />

condition and the accepted condition, even if the statement contains no rationale, unless:<br />

(1) Clear evidence <strong>of</strong> an intervening injury appears in the file, in which case factual<br />

bridging information should be requested if the necessary information was not submitted<br />

with Form CA-2a. (See <strong>FECA</strong> Program Memorandum 203 for a definition <strong>of</strong> an intervening<br />

injury);<br />

(2) An intervening decision, such as denial <strong>of</strong> continuing disability on the basis <strong>of</strong> a<br />

referee or second opinion specialist's report which constitutes the weight <strong>of</strong> medical<br />

evidence, has negated this relationship; or<br />

(3) The case was originally accepted for temporary aggravation <strong>of</strong> a pre-existing<br />

condition. In this instance, reasoned opinion supporting causal relationship to the work<br />

injury should be required.<br />

(4) The renewed claim involves a different diagnosis from the accepted condition.<br />

b. After 90 Days <strong>of</strong> Release from Medical Care (again, as stated by the physician or computed<br />

from the date <strong>of</strong> last examination or the physician's instruction to return PRN). The claimant is<br />

responsible for submitting an attending physician's report which contains a description <strong>of</strong> the<br />

objective findings and supports causal relationship between the claimant's current condition and<br />

the accepted condition.<br />

<strong>FECA</strong>-<strong>PT2</strong> Printed: 06/08/2010 644

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!