01.03.2013 Views

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2-1000-16 Benefits for Judicial Officials Assassinated in Performance<br />

16. Benefits for Judicial Officials Assassinated in Performance <strong>of</strong> Duty. Public Law 101-650, approved<br />

December 1, 1990, provides that the surviving spouse <strong>of</strong> an assassinated judicial <strong>of</strong>ficial may be paid both<br />

an annuity and compensation under the <strong>FECA</strong>. Judicial <strong>of</strong>ficials covered under this provision include a<br />

justice or judge <strong>of</strong> the U.S.; a judge <strong>of</strong> the District Court <strong>of</strong> Guam, the District Court <strong>of</strong> the Northern<br />

Mariana Islands, or the District Court <strong>of</strong> the Virgin Islands; or a full-time bankruptcy judge or a full-time<br />

U.S. magistrate. The annuity may be reduced if the total amount payable exceeds the current salary <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficial. Any such adjustment would be made by the employing agency, not<br />

OWCP.<br />

2-1000-17 Severance and Separation Pay<br />

17. Severance and Separation Pay. Employing agencies may grant severance pay to employees who<br />

are involuntarily separated as part <strong>of</strong> a reduction in force (RIF). Agencies may also <strong>of</strong>fer separation pay<br />

("buyouts") to encourage employees to leave Federal employment voluntarily. Certain severance and<br />

separation payments constitute dual benefits under the <strong>FECA</strong>.<br />

a. Definitions.<br />

(1) Severance pay was first authorized by the Federal Employees' Salary Act <strong>of</strong> 1965<br />

(Pub. Law 89-301, since codified at 5 U.S.C. 5595). Under this statute, severance pay<br />

could not be paid "concurrently with salary or on account <strong>of</strong> the death <strong>of</strong> another person."<br />

<strong>FECA</strong> Program Memorandum 55, dated January 24, 1968, interpreted the phrase<br />

"concurrently with salary" to allow payment <strong>of</strong> severance pay to claimants receiving benefits<br />

for LWEC, since the severance pay is calculated on the basis <strong>of</strong> the salary only, and does<br />

not take claimants' LWEC payments into consideration. Also, a schedule award may be paid<br />

concurrently.<br />

Severance pay represents a certain number <strong>of</strong> weeks worth <strong>of</strong> salary or wages, and it is<br />

usually computed as a lump sum. Health benefits and optional life insurance coverage may<br />

continue during the period <strong>of</strong> severance pay as long as the OWCP eventually makes<br />

payments for the time period covered by the severance pay to the Office <strong>of</strong> Personnel<br />

Management (OPM).<br />

(2) Separation pay is <strong>of</strong>fered in different forms by different agencies. Sometimes it is<br />

defined as a number <strong>of</strong> weeks <strong>of</strong> pay, and other times as a specific amount <strong>of</strong> money,<br />

according to the law governing the agency in question.<br />

For example, the Postal Service (in 1992) calculated its payments as six months <strong>of</strong> the<br />

employee's base pay, while the Department <strong>of</strong> Defense (starting in 1993) used the amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> severance pay to which the employee would have been entitled, or $25,000, whichever<br />

was less.<br />

b. Information Needed. The CE should ask the employing agency to submit:<br />

<strong>FECA</strong>-<strong>PT2</strong> Printed: 06/08/2010 545

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!