01.03.2013 Views

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(b) 5 percent <strong>of</strong> the total to be allocated to each child, up to a total <strong>of</strong> 15 percent<br />

for all children; and<br />

(c) The remainder to be allocated to the deceased federal employee.<br />

(3) In cases where causes <strong>of</strong> action are asserted for pain and suffering <strong>of</strong> the employee<br />

prior to his or her death, for loss <strong>of</strong> consortium, and for wrongful death, the following<br />

standard allocation percentages will be allowed:<br />

d. Malpractice.<br />

(a) 15 percent <strong>of</strong> the total to be allocated to the spouse’s claim for loss <strong>of</strong><br />

consortium;<br />

(b) 5 percent <strong>of</strong> the total to be allocated to each child up to a total <strong>of</strong> 10 percent<br />

for all children for loss <strong>of</strong> consortium;<br />

(c) 35 percent <strong>of</strong> the remainder after subtraction <strong>of</strong> the amounts attributed to<br />

loss or consortium to be allocated to the deceased federal employee, survival claim;<br />

and<br />

(d) 65 percent <strong>of</strong> the remainder after subtraction <strong>of</strong> the amounts attributed to<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> consortium to be allocated to the spouse, wrongful death claim.<br />

(1) Medical Malpractice. When a <strong>FECA</strong> beneficiary’s <strong>FECA</strong>-covered injuries are<br />

aggravated by medical malpractice, any settlement or judgment relating to the malpractice<br />

is a recovery subject to §8132. In omputing the required refund, a claimant may request to<br />

utilize only the disbursements attributable to the medical malpractice in filing his or her<br />

SOR. The claimant must provide probative evidence and analysis to allow a determination<br />

to be made by OWCP/FEEWC regarding the amount <strong>of</strong> the disbursements that would have<br />

been paid absent the malpractice, in order to subtract that amount from the total<br />

disbursements actually paid.<br />

Where none <strong>of</strong> the expenses properly attributable to the malpractice have been paid for or<br />

reimbursed by OWCP under the <strong>FECA</strong>, the claimant is still required to file a SOR for the<br />

malpractice recovery. This will normally result in a substantial third party surplus, which is<br />

unlikely to be absorbed (because any subsequent medical expenses and compensation<br />

benefits properly borne by OWCP would be attributable to the original compensable injury,<br />

rather than the injury caused by the malpractice).<br />

(2) Legal Malpractice. A recovery from a third party for legal malpractice is not<br />

considered a recovery subject to § 8132.<br />

e. Structured Settlements. One particular type <strong>of</strong> settlement agreement, generally referred to<br />

as a structured settlement, in which a third party makes an initial cash payment and also arranges,<br />

usually through the purchase <strong>of</strong> an annuity, for periodic payments over an extended period <strong>of</strong> time,<br />

raises a number <strong>of</strong> issues that must be carefully considered. The dollar amount to be included on<br />

<strong>FECA</strong>-<strong>PT2</strong> Printed: 06/08/2010 569

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!