01.03.2013 Views

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Where appropriate, reports should include the physician's interpretation <strong>of</strong> laboratory tests and<br />

diagnostic procedures. Tests for which such interpretation is necessary include, but are not limited<br />

to, X-rays, EKG, EEG, EMG, cardiac and pulmonary stress tests, pulmonary function tests, biopsy<br />

or surgical specimen pathology reports, ultrasound, visual field, echocardiograms, intravenous<br />

pyelograms, MRIs, and CAT scans.<br />

d. Medical Opinion with Rationale.<br />

(1) Not all medical opinions require rationale. In a simple traumatic injury, such as a<br />

knife cut which is reported to and seen by the physician promptly, there is no need to<br />

obtain a rationalized explanation <strong>of</strong> causal relationship.<br />

(2) When the relationship is not obvious or when there may have been an intervening<br />

non-occupational cause, it is essential that the physician give his or her medical reasons for<br />

relating the condition to the history obtained. A rationalized opinion is also necessary, and<br />

should be requested, when disability appears to last beyond the time frame anticipated for<br />

an injury <strong>of</strong> the type accepted (see the OWCP Medical Matrices, which are available on<br />

Folioviews in MEDGUIDE).<br />

(3) A medical opinion couched in such terms as "might be," "could be," or "may be"<br />

does not have as much probative value as an opinion stated unequivocally. However, if a<br />

sound medical reason is also given for the opinion, these expressions may sometimes<br />

represent the physician's mode <strong>of</strong> expression and should not be taken as reflecting a lack <strong>of</strong><br />

conviction, whether for or against the claim.<br />

Some physicians adhere more strongly than others to scientific methodology and prefer to<br />

use qualified terminology. The word "probably" can nearly always be taken as a<br />

redundancy, e.g. "probably related" means "related" and "probably preexisting" means<br />

"preexisting." If there is any doubt, the District Medical Adviser should be consulted, and<br />

clarification should be sought from the report physician if needed.<br />

2-0810-7 Reviews by District Medical Advisers (DMAs)<br />

7. Reviews by District Medical Advisers (DMAs). The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paragraph is to discuss the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> DMAs' services.<br />

a. DMAs have two broad technical medical functions:<br />

(1) Evaluation <strong>of</strong> medical evidence and the rendering <strong>of</strong> medical opinions in the DMA's<br />

own right. In this capacity the DMA may advise whether an accepted condition continues,<br />

whether a newly claimed condition is employment-related, whether the length <strong>of</strong> disability<br />

seems appropriate, or whether a recommended procedure or treatment is useful or<br />

necessary.<br />

(2) Interpretation and clarification <strong>of</strong> other physicians' reports. In this capacity the DMA<br />

may evaluate a report for determination <strong>of</strong> the percentage <strong>of</strong> permanent partial impairment,<br />

interpret test results, or "translate" technical language.<br />

<strong>FECA</strong>-<strong>PT2</strong> Printed: 06/08/2010 330

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!