01.03.2013 Views

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In any other case, where a judgment or settlement is paid to or on behalf <strong>of</strong> more than one<br />

individual, a determination will be made concerning the appropriate amount to be allocated to the<br />

injured employee, and the <strong>FECA</strong> beneficiary will be advised <strong>of</strong> that determination. The <strong>FECA</strong><br />

beneficiary may accept the determination or demonstrate good cause for a different allocation.<br />

Whether to accept a specific allocation is at the discretion <strong>of</strong> OWCP and FEEWC. Recurring<br />

circumstances involving allocations include:<br />

(1) Loss <strong>of</strong> Consortium. Any proposed deduction (Line 4) from the gross recovery<br />

reported on Line 1 <strong>of</strong> a SOR by attributing a portion <strong>of</strong> the settlement or judgment to<br />

damages for loss <strong>of</strong> consortium by a family member must be approved by OWCP or FEEWC.<br />

A portion <strong>of</strong> a settlement or judgment may be attributed to a cause <strong>of</strong> action for loss <strong>of</strong><br />

consortium and thus not included in the gross recovery <strong>of</strong> the <strong>FECA</strong> beneficiary set forth on<br />

a SOR only under the following conditions:<br />

(a) State law in the relevant state provides a cause <strong>of</strong> action for loss <strong>of</strong><br />

consortium for the family member to whom the recovery is attributed, and<br />

(b) A cause <strong>of</strong> action for loss <strong>of</strong> consortium was actually asserted by that family<br />

member, either in the same action or in separate actions, or in negotiation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

settlement where a settlement was obtained without the actual filing <strong>of</strong> litigation.In<br />

support <strong>of</strong> a request for an allocation <strong>of</strong> a portion <strong>of</strong> a settlement or judgment to a<br />

spouse or a child or children, the <strong>FECA</strong> beneficiary must demonstrate that the above<br />

referenced conditions are met by citation to appropriate state case law or statutes<br />

and by submission <strong>of</strong> a copy <strong>of</strong> the complaint filed on behalf <strong>of</strong> the spouse and/or<br />

children, or other relevant evidence.<br />

Upon receipt <strong>of</strong> such a request, absent unusual circumstances, an allocation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

joint settlement or judgment to loss <strong>of</strong> consortium in an amount <strong>of</strong> 25% or less for<br />

the spouse and 5% or less for each child up to a maximum <strong>of</strong> 15% for all children<br />

will be approved. In the event a <strong>FECA</strong> beneficiary seeks to justify an allocation in<br />

excess <strong>of</strong> these figures, it will be necessary for him or her to establish to the<br />

satisfaction <strong>of</strong> OWCP or FEEWC, through submission <strong>of</strong> evidence and legal argument,<br />

that a higher percentage is appropriate. Use <strong>of</strong> this formula is generally not<br />

appropriate in circumstances where a <strong>FECA</strong> beneficiary has died prior to settlement<br />

or judgment.<br />

<strong>FECA</strong>-<strong>PT2</strong> Printed: 06/08/2010 567

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!