01.03.2013 Views

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The CE must advise the claimant <strong>of</strong> the deficiencies <strong>of</strong> a claim before adjudicating it. Only one<br />

such notification is required, although the CE should attempt to clarify any discrepancies which<br />

arise from information already in file or received in response to the first request. If the time<br />

allowed for response expires and no reply has been received, the CE may adjudicate the case on<br />

the evidence <strong>of</strong> record.<br />

A Senior Claims Examiner (SrCE) may be assigned to develop and adjudicate a complex OD claim.<br />

Such assignment may be desirable where the agency disputes the facts in the case; where<br />

conferencing will likely be the most effective means <strong>of</strong> developing the factual evidence; or where<br />

factual discrepancies remain after several attempts to resolve them.<br />

2-0806-3 Kinds <strong>of</strong> OD Claims<br />

3. Kinds <strong>of</strong> OD Claims. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paragraph is to discuss the level <strong>of</strong> development required<br />

by various kinds <strong>of</strong> occupational disease claims. The level <strong>of</strong> development usually corresponds to the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> injury. Most cases will require limited or no development, while a smaller number will require<br />

full-scale, extensive development.<br />

a. Standard Development. Most claims for skin, orthopedic, virological, infectious, and<br />

parasitic diseases can be adjudicated with an initial request for information and perhaps a follow-up<br />

query for clarification. (Some will clearly address all five basic requirements and may be<br />

adjudicated on their face if all necessary evidence is in file). These cases are considered basic OD<br />

claims.<br />

(1) Examples. The following situations illustrate the kinds <strong>of</strong> cases which may be<br />

considered basic OD:<br />

(a) A claim for poison ivy where the claimant's employment involves exposure to<br />

the plant, and the medical evidence confirms the diagnosis.<br />

(b) A claim for a stress fracture <strong>of</strong> the foot from a letter carrier who walks a<br />

route, where the medical evidence confirms the diagnosis and relates it to extensive<br />

walking.<br />

(c) A claim for carpal tunnel syndrome from a postal letter-sorting machine (LSM)<br />

operator where medical tests establish the diagnosis.<br />

(d) A claim for brucellosis filed by a meat inspector where medical evidence<br />

shows that Brucella was cultured from the employee's blood.<br />

(2) Adjudication. The CE may accept a basic OD case if the file contains a statement<br />

describing the employment-related exposure and a medical report which both defines the<br />

medical condition and relates it to the claimed exposure. An affirmative opinion on causal<br />

relationship, without rationale, will be sufficient to accept most cases. In questionable<br />

cases, the CE must determine whether further medical development, such as a letter to the<br />

attending physician or a second opinion examination, is needed before adjudication.<br />

(3) Disability. If the medical evidence <strong>of</strong> record establishes disability, the CE should take<br />

<strong>FECA</strong>-<strong>PT2</strong> Printed: 06/08/2010 226

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!