01.03.2013 Views

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2-1601-9 Cases Returned from H&R<br />

9. Cases Returned from H&R. Any case requiring further action should be assigned to a CE to take<br />

the required action.<br />

a. Timeliness <strong>of</strong> Action. Substantive action should be taken within 15 days <strong>of</strong> return <strong>of</strong> the<br />

case file.<br />

b. Reinstatement <strong>of</strong> Benefits. If the hearing decision concludes that the Office did not meet its<br />

burden <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> before reducing or terminating benefits, the following actions will be taken:<br />

(1) The Hearing Representative will release a letter to the claimant or representative<br />

enclosing Form CA-7 (or, in the case <strong>of</strong> death benefits, Form CA-12) and request completion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the form.<br />

(2) Upon receipt <strong>of</strong> the completed form, the district <strong>of</strong>fice should promptly reinstate<br />

benefits to the claimant at the previous level, including retroactive payment to the date <strong>of</strong><br />

reduction or termination.<br />

(3) If the completed form shows earnings, employment, or receipt <strong>of</strong> an annuity, the CE<br />

should obtain an election or additional information including a CA 1032 as necessary.<br />

(4) The Form CA-7 is intended to cover the entire period during which benefits were<br />

terminated or reduced. Only one Form CA-7 need be completed. In general, further<br />

payments should be made on the periodic roll.<br />

c. Review <strong>of</strong> the Remand Decision. If the District Office, upon careful review, believes the<br />

remand decision issued by the Branch <strong>of</strong> Hearings and Review contains a serious error <strong>of</strong> fact or<br />

law, the District Director should contact the Hearings and Review Branch Chief (or Assistant Branch<br />

Chief) within 15 days <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> the decision outlining the basis for the disagreement. This<br />

review process, rarely employed, should be reserved for cases where there is a material factual<br />

error or a misinterpretation <strong>of</strong> the statute, regulations or procedures that is critical to the decision.<br />

If, upon review <strong>of</strong> the decision, the Hearings and Review Branch Chief determines that the decision<br />

issued was in error, the decision may be vacated through 5 U.S.C. 8128, which provides for review<br />

<strong>of</strong> a decision allowing or denying compensation “at any time.” If upon review <strong>of</strong> the decision the<br />

Hearings and Review Branch Chief determines that the decision issued was appropriate, no action<br />

will be taken. This process does not apply to Employing Agencies.<br />

This process also does not apply to claimants or their authorized representatives, since appeal<br />

rights are issued with every decision <strong>of</strong> the Branch <strong>of</strong> Hearings and Review.<br />

2-1601 Exhibit 1: Sample <strong>Letter</strong> Acknowledging Request for Hearing<br />

Dear CLAIMANT NAME:<br />

I am writing concerning the above captioned compensation case and the request for a<br />

<strong>FECA</strong>-<strong>PT2</strong> Printed: 06/08/2010 663

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!