01.03.2013 Views

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the result or being terminated from his employment because <strong>of</strong> discrimination. The evidence<br />

showed that the employee's dismissal was properly based on his willful misconduct and the charges<br />

<strong>of</strong> discrimination were unsupported. The Board found that the employee's emotional upset was<br />

self-generated and did not arise out <strong>of</strong> or in the course <strong>of</strong> his Federal employment.<br />

In Helen Marrotte, claiming as widow <strong>of</strong> Walter E. Marrotte, 36 ECAB 670 (1985), the employee<br />

accepted stolen military clothing from a co-worker who claimed to have found it in a locker. The<br />

employee was found to have had no part in the theft, but he received a written reprimand for<br />

having in his possession military clothing not received through regular supply channels. He filed a<br />

grievance but died <strong>of</strong> cardiac arrest before hearing were concluded. The Board found that,<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> whether the employee knew that the clothing had been stolen, his acceptance <strong>of</strong> it<br />

through other than <strong>of</strong>ficial channels was unrelated to his regular day-to-day duties, his specifically<br />

assigned duties or to a requirement imposed by his employment, and therefore the proceedings<br />

instituted against him were not factors <strong>of</strong> his employment.<br />

In Pauline Phillips 36 ECAB 377 (1984), the employee, a postmaster, signed a petition regarding a<br />

community problem, which lead to a complaint filed against her by a local businessman. She<br />

received notice from the Postal Service that the complaint would be investigated. She alleged that<br />

worry over this caused her to develop an anxiety reaction and congestive heart failure. No<br />

investigation was initiated and Postal Service <strong>of</strong>ficials assured the employee that no adverse action<br />

would be taken against her. In finding that the employee was not entitled to coverage under the<br />

Act, the Board noted that her emotional reaction allegedly resulted from a situation which did not<br />

involve her ability to perform her day-to-day duties, or a special assignment, or because <strong>of</strong> a<br />

requirement imposed by the employing establishment. The situation arose because she exercised<br />

her rights as a private citizen.<br />

The Board noted a similarity to the case <strong>of</strong> Manuel W. Vetti, 33 ECAB 750 (1982), a postmaster<br />

who developed a disabling emotional condition due to his reaction in an investigation involving a<br />

sale to the employing establishment <strong>of</strong> a parcel <strong>of</strong> land in which he had an interest. The Board<br />

found that the fact that the investigation would not have been initiated if Vetti were not a<br />

postmaster was "not a sufficient link to employment to consider his emotional reaction to it to have<br />

arisen out <strong>of</strong> the employment."<br />

<strong>FECA</strong>-<strong>PT2</strong> Printed: 06/08/2010 204

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!