01.03.2013 Views

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

Printing - FECA-PT2 - National Association of Letter Carriers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(3) Personal habits such as smoking or drinking, as relevant to the claim. While a<br />

smoking history would be particularly pertinent in an asbestosis claim, tobacco or alcohol<br />

use can affect many medical conditions.<br />

(4) Concurrent medical condition(s), as potentially relevant to the claim. Pregnancy<br />

would be a relevant factor in a claim for carpal tunnel syndrome.<br />

(5) Off-duty activities, employment and hobbies.<br />

(6) Family circumstances and potential <strong>of</strong>f-duty stress factors, as relevant to the claim,<br />

such as claims for psychological/emotional stress.<br />

(7) A description <strong>of</strong> the claimant's work (mental, physical and environmental). However,<br />

a copy <strong>of</strong> the position description should not be used verbatim, since at best it will provide<br />

only general information or may be inaccurate or incomplete.<br />

2-0809-7 Exclusions from SOAFs<br />

7. Exclusions from SOAFs. Not all information contained in a case file bears on the issues to be<br />

resolved in connection with the SOAF. Some information is irrelevant, while other material is<br />

inappropriate, prejudicial, or better discussed elsewhere. The following items should not be included in<br />

the SOAF:<br />

a. Evidence. Raw evidence, such as a police report or time card, should be not be attached or<br />

described verbatim in the SOAF. The CE is responsible for making decisions on raw evidence and<br />

incorporating the findings into the SOAF.<br />

b. Justifications or Reasons for Conclusions Reached. The CE's findings should be supported<br />

by the evidence <strong>of</strong> record. Any explanation <strong>of</strong> the findings should be made in a memorandum to<br />

the file, not in the SOAF.<br />

c. Medical Opinions. Such opinions should not, however, be confused with the medical history<br />

<strong>of</strong> the claim, which may properly be included. Chronologies <strong>of</strong> care and nature <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

received are facts surrounding the medical aspects <strong>of</strong> a claim, but are not themselves medical<br />

opinions.<br />

d. Payment <strong>of</strong> OWCP Compensation and OPM Annuities. An exception to this rule can be made<br />

in a psychological/emotional stress claim where the claimant has alleged to physicians that he or<br />

she is not receiving any income. Here the CE should state when benefits began and whether they<br />

continue or were terminated.<br />

e. Issues for Determination. The SOAF is not used to outline the factual issues to be resolved.<br />

Factual issues belong in memoranda to the file. Medical issues to be resolved are properly<br />

addressed in a memorandum to the file or a letter to the physician.<br />

f. Definitions <strong>of</strong> Terms. When a CE needs to define such terms as aggravation, precipitation<br />

or acceleration, he or she should do so in a letter to the physician along with the questions to be<br />

answered.<br />

<strong>FECA</strong>-<strong>PT2</strong> Printed: 06/08/2010 313

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!