23.03.2013 Views

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

82 Conservation of Furniture<br />

environment of 70% RH (from Figure 2.14<br />

assume an EMC = 13%). The board is then<br />

moved to an indoor environment of 30% RH<br />

(EMC = 6%). From Figure 2.14 assume an FSP<br />

of 30%. Published data for mahogany indicate<br />

a 5.1% tangential shrinkage (Hoadley, 1980).<br />

Therefore, the estimated change in the width<br />

of the board is calculated as:<br />

14.5 in (0.13 – 0.06)<br />

D = <br />

0.<br />

30<br />

– 0.30 + 0.13<br />

0.<br />

051<br />

D = 1.<br />

015<br />

= 0.178 in<br />

5.<br />

712<br />

Thus the board would shrink by 0.178 inches.<br />

Where direct measurement of moisture content<br />

is impossible and where precise numerical<br />

values are unrealistic, the above formula may<br />

be of more academic than practical use. An<br />

equally useful and reasonable approach is a<br />

graphic method of estimating dimensional<br />

change. Combining the oscillating curve of<br />

Figure 2.14 with the idea of Figure 2.17, a<br />

composite working graph can be devised, as<br />

shown in Figure 2.18.<br />

Based on the species and growth-ring orientation<br />

of a piece of wood in question, the<br />

appropriate shrinkage percentage (St, Sr, or<br />

interpolated estimate) is taken from published<br />

data. On the right-hand side of Figure 2.18,<br />

choose the EMC/S line that most closely<br />

matches the shrinkage percentage of the subject.<br />

Estimates of changes in RH can now be<br />

translated into percentage dimensional change<br />

by following RH values up and over to corresponding<br />

EMC values, then over and down to<br />

corresponding S values.<br />

The graphic relationship between relative<br />

humidity, moisture content and shrinkage<br />

draws attention to the important point that relative<br />

humidity is the important controlling parameter<br />

and dimensional change is the eventual<br />

consequence. Too often, relative humidity is<br />

not given the serious attention it deserves.<br />

Although moisture content is usually not of<br />

direct concern, it can be important indirectly, if<br />

we remember that the weight of wood reflects<br />

the moisture content. A furniture object probably<br />

loses or gains weight primarily as a<br />

response to changes of moisture content of its<br />

wooden components. This change takes place<br />

before any significant dimensional change<br />

(where wood is restrained, it may not actually<br />

be possible to observe dimensional change).<br />

Placing of furniture on a weighing device such<br />

as a load cell could be used as a quite accurate<br />

and relatively inexpensive means of monitoring<br />

the weight of an object. It could therefore be<br />

an excellent way to detect and prevent changing<br />

conditions which might eventually result in<br />

dimensional change problems, especially when<br />

wooden objects are being transported or relocated<br />

in a new environment. Such a device<br />

could actually be connected to humidification<br />

equipment thereby allowing the object to control<br />

its own environment.<br />

Although dimensional change alone may be<br />

a serious consequence of moisture variation,<br />

shrinkage and swelling that is uneven, even<br />

though in minor amounts, can cause distortion<br />

of a piece from its desired or intended shape.<br />

Various forms of distortion include cup (deviation<br />

from flatness across the width of a board),<br />

bow (deviation from lengthwise flatness of a<br />

board), crook or spring (departure in end-toend<br />

straightness along the edge of a board),<br />

and twist (where four corners of a flat face do<br />

not lie in the same plane).<br />

A common source of uneven dimensional<br />

change is simply the greater tangential than<br />

radial shrinkage percentage, a routine cause of<br />

cup in boards, as shown in Figure 2.16. Note<br />

that flat sawn boards located closest to the pith<br />

have most severe cup, concentrated near the<br />

centre. Unequal radial and tangential shrinkage<br />

causes round turnings to dry to ovals, squares<br />

with diagonal ring placement to become diamond-shaped<br />

(as a rule of thumb, growth ring<br />

lines tend to straighten). In log sections, or timbers<br />

containing the pith of the tree, the greater<br />

tangential shrinkage develops circumferential<br />

stresses which may exceed the strength of the<br />

wood, resulting in radial cracks.<br />

The fact that dimensional change is greater<br />

at right-angles to the grain than parallel to it<br />

also produces problems. The opening of mitre<br />

joints and the loosening of mortise and tenon<br />

joints are classic examples. Other causes of<br />

uneven shrinkage are uneven drying, or material<br />

with abnormal wood (such as reaction<br />

wood, juvenile wood etc.) This topic is discussed<br />

in more detail in Chapter 7.<br />

With time, the dimensional response of<br />

wood may lessen, in part because hygroscopicity<br />

of the wood may decrease, or because of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!