23.03.2013 Views

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.10 Adhesives<br />

In practice, adhesives and adherends often fail<br />

long before theoretical calculations of bond<br />

strengths predict that they should. In theory,<br />

failure can occur within the adherend, along<br />

the adhesive interface or within the adhesive.<br />

In practice it will occur at the weakest point<br />

in the system. This normally involves cohesive<br />

failure in the adhesive layer (Kinloch, 1987).<br />

In the case of surface coatings with a layer<br />

structure (support, ground, paint, varnish etc.)<br />

each component of the laminate may potentially<br />

fail adhesively or cohesively.<br />

It has been argued that all joint failure is<br />

actually cohesive and that even where failure<br />

has apparently occurred at the interface there<br />

is still a very thin layer of adhesive on the<br />

surface of the adherend (or, conversely, a thin<br />

layer of adherend on the surface of the<br />

adhesive). This suggests that the bulk properties<br />

of an adhesive can be different from those<br />

at the boundary layer of the interface and that<br />

it is the formation of a weak boundary layer<br />

which leads to adhesive failure. The theory of<br />

the weak boundary layer suggests that if a<br />

region of low cohesive strength exists at the<br />

interface between a substrate and a hardened<br />

adhesive, failure will occur at a lower stress<br />

level than predicted. High surface energy<br />

solids attract low surface energy contaminants<br />

and these may prevent a strong adhesive bond<br />

from forming if they are not displaced before<br />

joint formation. Weak boundary layers may<br />

also form in situ after the adhesive joint has<br />

been assembled.<br />

Delollis (1973) has argued that this is an<br />

oversimplified generalization and has proposed<br />

an alternative mechanism of desorption<br />

of adhesive caused by contamination of the<br />

interface by water. This desorption may occur<br />

either through absorption of water by the<br />

adhesive followed by migration to the interface<br />

or by water diffusing along the adhesiveadherend<br />

interface.<br />

Other factors which may contribute to<br />

adhesive joint failure include inherent differences<br />

between adhesive and adherend (e.g.<br />

density, coefficient of linear thermal expansion,<br />

modulus of elasticity etc.) air bubbles<br />

trapped at the interface or in the adhesive,<br />

swelling in response to exposure to polar<br />

molecules such as water, stress concentrations<br />

Deterioration of other materials and structures 345<br />

(e.g. caused by the geometry of the joint),<br />

contamination of the adherend surfaces,<br />

improper preparation of the adhesive (e.g.<br />

inadequate mixing of two pack adhesives or<br />

overcooking of animal glue) and deterioration<br />

of the adhesive in storage. The effects of<br />

inherent differences between materials are<br />

most likely to be concentrated at the interface<br />

and to produce stress concentrations in the<br />

boundary layer that may predispose to failure<br />

in this region.<br />

8.11 Deterioration of specific<br />

materials<br />

8.11.1 Oils and fats<br />

The high susceptibility of fatty acids containing<br />

two or more double bonds to oxidation is<br />

the basis of their use as drying oils, the<br />

gradual conversion of liquid oil through soft<br />

gel to rubbery solid occurring as a result of<br />

free radical chain reactions (Mills and White,<br />

1987). Oxidation, which at first is necessary for<br />

drying continues throughout the life of the film<br />

which becomes more oxidized and crosslinked<br />

and consequently more brittle and less soluble<br />

with time, especially under the influence of<br />

UV radiation. At the same time, oxidation<br />

reactions may occur that are degradative in<br />

nature leading to the formation of small<br />

molecules such as carboxylic acids. The influence<br />

of pigments (and other additions) on the<br />

behaviour of linseed oil films is very profound.<br />

As a clear exterior finish, linseed oil would fail<br />

under the influence of UV radiation in a matter<br />

of weeks but when used in pigmented finishes<br />

it is very satisfactory. Besides light, the influence<br />

of metal ions and the availability of<br />

oxygen, as determined by the thickness of the<br />

film, are of great importance. Yellowing is<br />

most marked in oils containing appreciable<br />

amounts of linolenic acid (e.g. linseed oil).<br />

The ester groups of fatty acid esters may be<br />

broken down by saponification or hydrolysis<br />

to yield glycerol and free fatty acids. Under<br />

appropriate conditions this form of degradation<br />

of fats can be achieved by micro-organisms<br />

such as Staphylococcus spp. and Proteus<br />

spp. The probable mechanisms involved in<br />

these reactions are outlined by Mills and White<br />

(1987). The behaviour of different oils and the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!