23.03.2013 Views

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(a) (b)<br />

to changes in the medium used that are different<br />

from the original medium and may extend<br />

considerably beyond the original areas of loss<br />

(Figure 8.7). When varnish is removed from a<br />

surface during cleaning it may be left in the<br />

hollows of the texture of a paint film and may<br />

show up later as a mottled darkening of the<br />

surface. Such varnish may prove difficult to<br />

remove without causing damage to the paint.<br />

Previous treatments to improve clarity of a<br />

surface may have included rubbing with oil,<br />

leaving a sticky film which collects dirt.<br />

Mechanical deterioration of paint includes<br />

scratches, dents and abrasion. Old wear and<br />

natural abrasion of a painted decorative surface<br />

through use is common in furniture and often<br />

considered appropriate and part of its history<br />

(Figure 8.8). The degree to which this sort of<br />

deterioration of a decorative surface is considered<br />

acceptable and what sort of treatment is<br />

in order may vary from collection to collection.<br />

However, the evidence found in a surface<br />

coating about an objects history is valuable and<br />

should not be discarded simply to obtain an<br />

ideal appearance for display. For further information<br />

on historic binding media, the technology<br />

of paints and the defects of paint films see<br />

Masschelein-Kleiner (1985), Martens (1968) and<br />

Hess (1965).<br />

8.9.4 Transparent top coatings –<br />

varnishes<br />

Changes in the appearance, mechanical<br />

properties and solubility of coatings result<br />

Deterioration of other materials and structures 337<br />

Figure 8.8 Old wear and natural abrasion: (a) detail of natural wear on the arm of a painted chair, Pennsylvania,<br />

c.1750; (b) detail of natural wear on a painted blanket chest, Pennsylvania, c.1788<br />

from a combination of chemical and physical<br />

interactions between the coating and its<br />

environment. Coatings are usually readily<br />

oxidized. Light, heat and moisture are important<br />

contributing factors. The most common<br />

visual change is a reduction in transparency.<br />

This is particularly true with natural resins.<br />

Changes in the optical qualities of the coating<br />

may include colour changes such as yellowing<br />

and darkening, changes in gloss and loss<br />

in transparency. Cracking, checking and<br />

crystallization may contribute to these<br />

changes. The adhesion of transparent coatings<br />

to the underlying decorative surface may fail<br />

causing it to de-laminate and flake off. This<br />

can also cause a significant change in the<br />

visual properties of the surface and leave<br />

portions of it exposed to the environment.<br />

SEM photographs of aged resin coatings on<br />

wood are shown in Figure 12.8c,d. As<br />

coatings age, the molecular structure is likely<br />

to be altered chemically, particularly due to<br />

photochemical reactions involving oxygen.<br />

Reduction in molecular weight and average<br />

length of polymer chains are common consequences<br />

of this process. Crazing or craquelure<br />

is a common manifestation of oxidation, and<br />

will cause the varnish to refract or bend light<br />

differently than when fresh, causing a visual<br />

change. While an aged coating may appeared<br />

to have ‘dried out’, it is actually a much more<br />

complicated combination of non-reversible<br />

physical and chemical changes. The notion of<br />

‘feeding’ such a dried out surface to restore its<br />

vitality is inappropriate and misinformed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!