23.03.2013 Views

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34 Conservation of Furniture<br />

or by substituting other materials in place of<br />

metal and shell.<br />

Marquetry was reproduced by embossing or<br />

printing decorative designs onto paper that<br />

were then transferred to woods and varnished<br />

over. This process was patented as xylography.<br />

Another method called diachromatizing used<br />

stains to produce a pattern which penetrated<br />

the wood. Ready-made marquetry, mouldings<br />

and carvings were available from wholesale<br />

suppliers in increasing numbers throughout the<br />

period.<br />

The revival of interest in pietre dure, where<br />

coloured stones were let into an ebony or<br />

stone face, continued a tradition that started in<br />

Italy in the seventeenth century.<br />

Tunbridge Ware Already known in the eighteenth<br />

century, the technique of the process<br />

was changed in the early part of the nineteenth<br />

century. The method used was to glue a selection<br />

of thin strips or rods together in a predetermined<br />

way. Once these bunches were dry,<br />

they would be sawn transversely to reveal a<br />

pattern that could be laid down as a veneer.<br />

The mini mosaic effect was best suited to small<br />

items, such as trays, boxes, tea caddies and<br />

small table tops (Figure 1.22). It is thought that<br />

only woods in natural colours were used.<br />

Finishing Graining, staining and marbling<br />

were all processes that were well known to<br />

furniture-makers and were practised widely in<br />

the first half of the nineteenth century. These<br />

processes enjoyed a revival not only for cost<br />

saving reasons, but also because regular supplies<br />

of timber were interrupted by the Anglo-<br />

Figure 1.22 Tunbridge Ware writing box, English,<br />

1830–70<br />

French wars. Graining was acceptable and<br />

strongly recommended by commentators on<br />

interior decoration. However, by the mid-century<br />

these practices were criticized as deceits,<br />

and towards the end of the century were only<br />

associated with low-grade furniture.<br />

The finishing processes were explicitly<br />

described in contemporary trade manuals, the<br />

most important being Nathaniel Whittock’s The<br />

Decorative Painters’ and Glaziers’ Guide.<br />

Staining was important as a finishing process<br />

and it was acknowledged that the method was<br />

especially suited to bulk treatments. Whittock<br />

mentions how chairs are dipped in large copper<br />

vats and allowed to hang and dry. The dye<br />

for this process was made from Brazilwood<br />

chips and pearlash (potassium carbonate).<br />

Other methods included the use of alkanet dye<br />

mixed with linseed oil, as a colour enhancer<br />

and reviver for mahogany. During the 1820s<br />

French polish was introduced. This was originally<br />

designed to give a thick transparent coating<br />

which would impart a highly glazed effect<br />

without changing the colour of the timber. By<br />

the mid-century the process had acquired a<br />

bad name because staining caused by the polish<br />

obliterated the natural colours of the wood<br />

and stopped it ‘ageing’ naturally.<br />

Organization of trades and<br />

manufacturing<br />

In 1803, Sheraton could say that the furniture<br />

trade was ‘one of the leading mechanical professions<br />

in every polite nation in Europe’. It is<br />

still often considered that the so-called<br />

‘Industrial Revolution’ brought furniture-making<br />

into a factory situation during the nineteenth<br />

century, which, combined with the use of<br />

machines, dramatically changed the way furniture<br />

was made over the period. This is not the<br />

case, although there were undoubtedly some<br />

changes. The enduring nature of the trade and<br />

its attitudes to change were such that new<br />

methods were only espoused if they contributed<br />

to profitability. Technological change<br />

was not necessary while the older ways met the<br />

demand. This is not to say that factories did not<br />

exist, simply that there was no dramatic change<br />

from one system to another; it was rather a<br />

gradual process that is still not really complete.<br />

In England the rise of wholesalers and retail<br />

outlets which gradually took over from the<br />

comprehensive manufacturing firms was a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!