23.03.2013 Views

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

710 Conservation of Furniture<br />

The consolidation of flakes on a mercury<br />

amalgam mirror may be problematic as the<br />

oxidized tin layer is very brittle. The traditional<br />

method of laying a flake by applying consolidant<br />

under the flake and then adhering it to<br />

the substrate with a heated spatula is not<br />

appropriate for mercury amalgam surfaces.<br />

The application of pressure to the flake will<br />

break or shatter it. In addition to problems<br />

with appearance, the crystal structure of the<br />

mercury amalgam phase has an upper limit of<br />

58 °C (Hadsund, 1993). In some cases the<br />

application of a small amount of consolidant<br />

to the thin edge of a flake may provide a<br />

bridge that secures the flake in place. Such<br />

consolidant should be very viscous (e.g. 50/50<br />

w/v Paraloid B72 in acetone). If this procedure<br />

is undertaken the minimum amount of<br />

consolidant should be used and it should not<br />

end up under the flake.<br />

Techniques for consolidation of the painted<br />

layer of reverse painted glass are unlike those<br />

used in painting conservation. The glass is an<br />

inflexible support of a very different nature to<br />

canvas or panel paintings. Traditional methods<br />

of varnishing the reverse or injecting voids<br />

with resin have usually been unsatisfactory<br />

and, due to shrinkage of the consolidant, may<br />

have exacerbated the problem. Refixing flakes<br />

of detached paint is a specialist task that<br />

should be referred to a conservator with<br />

experience of reverse painted glass.<br />

15.5.11 Restoration and retouching<br />

The use of metal foils to patch areas of loss<br />

is inadvisable because of the probability that<br />

the mercury will react with the repair material<br />

and that galvanic corrosion will occur (see<br />

section 8.4). Jackson (1987) used a technique<br />

in which mirrored Melinex/Mylar sheet was<br />

laid behind the mirror to disguise areas<br />

where the amalgam had been lost. A similar<br />

technique may be used for areas of loss on<br />

reverse painted glass. A coloured background<br />

acid free paper, tinted with water colours if<br />

necessary, may be laid behind the reverse<br />

painting for small areas of loss. Larger details<br />

may be painted onto a sheet of Melinex/<br />

Mylar and positioned so that the replacement<br />

is aligned with the original design. This<br />

should be secured to the backing and not the<br />

glass.<br />

15.5.12 Coatings<br />

Coatings are not appropriate for undecorated,<br />

reverse painted or mirrored glass. The application<br />

of a coating to a mercury amalgam<br />

surface is not recommended. The deterioration<br />

of tin/mercury mirrored surfaces is irreversible.<br />

Blackened areas result from the separation of<br />

the tin/mercury amalgam into constituent<br />

components followed by oxidation of the tin.<br />

Impregnation or coating with a resin will not<br />

slow down or prevent this deterioration and<br />

cannot prevent crystal growth or other changes<br />

in the amalgam. Further, attempts to remove<br />

such a coating in the future are likely to<br />

damage the amalgam surface. The most effective<br />

way of ensuring longevity to mirrored or<br />

decorated glass is to ensure that it is protected<br />

from physical and environmental damage.<br />

Bibliography<br />

15.1 Ivory, bone, antler, turtleshell,<br />

horn and mother-of-pearl<br />

Bitmead, R. (1873) The London Cabinet Maker’s Guide,<br />

London<br />

Davison, S. (1998) Reversible fills for transparent and<br />

translucent materials, JAIC, 37(1), 35–47<br />

Down, J.L., MacDonald, M.A., Williams, J.T. and Williams,<br />

R.S. (1996) Adhesive testing at the Canadian<br />

Conservation Institute – an evaluation of selected<br />

poly(vinyl acetate) and acrylic adhesives, Studies in<br />

Conservation, 41(1), 19–44<br />

Driggers, J.M., Mussey, R.D. and Garvin, S.M. (1991)<br />

Treatment of an ivory inlaid Anglo-Indian desk<br />

bookcase, in AIC <strong>Wood</strong>en Artifacts Group Conference<br />

papers, Albuquerque<br />

Espinoza, E.O. and Mann, M. (1992) Identification Guide<br />

for Ivory and Ivory Substitutes, World Wildlife Fund,<br />

Washington, DC<br />

Hawkins, D. (1986) The Technique of <strong>Wood</strong> Surface<br />

Decoration, Batsford<br />

LaFontaine, R.H. and <strong>Wood</strong>, P.A. (1982) The stabilization<br />

of ivory against relative humidity fluctuations, Studies in<br />

Conservation, 27(3), 109–17<br />

Lochhead, V. (1989) Tortoise-shell substitute veneer,<br />

Conservation News, 38, 31–2<br />

Matienzo, L.J. and Snow, C.E. (1986) The chemical effects<br />

of hydrochloric acid and organic solvents on the surface<br />

of ivory, Studies in Conservation, 31(3), 133–9<br />

Mussey, R. (ed.) (1987) The First American Furniture<br />

Finisher’s Manual, reprint of the 1827 edition of The<br />

Cabinet-Maker’s Guide, Dover<br />

Ramond, P. (1989) Marquetry, Taunton Press<br />

Rao, S. and Subbaiah, K.V. (1983) Indian ivory, Journal of<br />

Archaeological Chemistry, 1 (1), 1–10<br />

Siddons, G.A. (1830) The Cabinet Maker’s Guide,<br />

Sherwood, Gilbert and Piper

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!