23.03.2013 Views

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the United States. In the UK, the Timber<br />

Research and Development Association<br />

(TRADA) has published simple keys of this<br />

type for both hardwood and softwood identification.<br />

Dichotomous identification keys,<br />

accompanied with 10 to 15 photographs of<br />

transverse cross-sections of wood provide useful<br />

supportive data with the hand-lens identification<br />

method (Normand, 1972). The main<br />

disadvantage of this approach is that no match<br />

will be found when that particular genus or<br />

species is not included in the key, means that<br />

it is often useful to adopt a more flexible<br />

approach (Brazier and Franklin, 1961; Hoadley,<br />

1990).<br />

Multiple entry key systems exist that are<br />

based on either perforated cards or computer<br />

systems. Examples of multiple entry perforated<br />

card systems are published by the Forest<br />

Products Research Laboratory (FPRL) and<br />

described by Brazier and Franklin (1961),<br />

Phillips (1960) and Henderson (1960). Multientry<br />

computer sorting systems have been<br />

developed based on the traditional FPRL perforated<br />

card system. Especially within the<br />

International Association of <strong>Wood</strong> Anatomists<br />

(IAWA), there is an ongoing discussion about<br />

some of these programs, combined with<br />

reviews of suitable wood anatomical features.<br />

The General Unknown Entry Search System<br />

(GUESS) by Wheeler (Wheeler et al., 1986) is a<br />

useful and inexpensive PC program containing<br />

more than five thousand taxa in eight different<br />

databases, and is accompanied by an excellent<br />

textbook. Miller (1980), and Miller et al. (1981,<br />

1987) has described more elaborate systems<br />

that operate with a larger number of features.<br />

Other programs were developed for specific<br />

regions or countries. Jiaju and Fang (1990)<br />

describe the <strong>Wood</strong> Identification Program<br />

(WIP) for woods mostly from China. A review<br />

of current computer search programs is given<br />

by Wheeler and Baas (1998).<br />

Reference material should consist of microscope<br />

slides made of vouchered wood<br />

samples, wood descriptions and photo-micrographs<br />

of wood sections (Détienne and<br />

Jacquet, 1983; Fahn et al., 1986; Grosser, 1977;<br />

Miles, 1978; Panshin and deZeeuw, 1980;<br />

Schweingruber, 1990). Vouchered wood samples<br />

are specimens of woody plants of which<br />

the leaves, fruits or flowers also were collected<br />

of the same exact plant, and identified to the<br />

<strong>Wood</strong> and wooden structures 61<br />

species level for taxonomic purposes. Gregory<br />

(1980) provides an annotated bibliography on<br />

wood identification including a listing by<br />

botanical family, growth regions and microscopic<br />

features with cross references to more<br />

than 450 bibliographic entries.<br />

<strong>Wood</strong> identification is typically an invasive<br />

and destructive process, at least to the extent<br />

that some wood tissue must be disturbed. The<br />

process usually consists of removing small<br />

samples or sections, or at least in cleanly cutting<br />

into a surface to expose cell structure for<br />

examination. In identifying woods of historic<br />

objects, a primary responsibility is to utilize<br />

approaches that accomplish identification with<br />

the least possible disturbance to the object.<br />

2.2.5 Hand–lens examination<br />

A routine starting point in identifying a given<br />

piece of wood is to locate a tiny area of endgrain<br />

surface where the wood can be cut<br />

cleanly with a razor blade or equally sharp tool<br />

to expose longitudinal cells in cross-section.<br />

When the exposed surface is examined with a<br />

good quality 10 magnifier or hand lens, it can<br />

immediately be identified as a hardwood<br />

(pores visible) or softwood (pores absent). In<br />

addition, placement of growth rings and rays<br />

indicates the orientation of radial and tangential<br />

planes in the wood.<br />

In cases where pores (and in some cases<br />

conspicuous rays) give immediate indication<br />

that the unknown is a hardwood, the pore distribution<br />

and size range suggests whether the<br />

wood is ring-porous, semi-ring-porous or diffuse-porous.<br />

This process of examination and<br />

deduction continues until all features have<br />

been evaluated. In summary, among hardwoods,<br />

hand lens observation of transverse<br />

surfaces reveals the relative width and distinctiveness<br />

of rays, the size and distribution of<br />

pores, and characteristic patterns of parenchyma<br />

cells.<br />

An acetate measuring gauge, which can be<br />

ordered from most forest products laboratories,<br />

is helpful in measuring features such as pore<br />

quantity and size. Careful evaluation of typical<br />

characteristics will usually suggest an identification,<br />

at least to the genus, for most temperate<br />

region hardwoods. However, it is routinely<br />

recommended to follow through with microscopic<br />

examination of thin sections to confirm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!