23.03.2013 Views

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

Series editors' preface - Wood Tools

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10.2.4 Reinforcing joints<br />

If a loose joint has been treated so that it is<br />

well adhered with closely mating surfaces,<br />

reinforcement with fixings such as nails, screws<br />

or metal brackets is unlikely to be necessary.<br />

Such fixings have often been employed by<br />

amateurs in an attempt to reinforce loose or<br />

weak joints. Some, such as screws and nails,<br />

inevitably lead to substantial further damage to<br />

loose joints, whilst the effect of others, such as<br />

obtrusive metal brackets, have met with varying<br />

success. If the underlying problem of the<br />

loose joint is not addressed all these methods<br />

will result in substantial further damage to the<br />

joint and the surrounding wood as leverage<br />

forces become concentrated on a small area of<br />

contact around the fixings. Fixings such as<br />

screws and nails are often difficult to remove<br />

without widening the area of damage.<br />

If screws or nails are part of the original<br />

construction of the object, as a general rule<br />

they should be retained in their original positions.<br />

Adhering small blocks of wood along the<br />

grain may strengthen a joint when no other<br />

option exists. When applied with animal/hide<br />

glue they are readily removable without<br />

damage to the original.<br />

10.2.5 Frames<br />

The construction techniques used in frames are<br />

similar to those used in joinery and cabinetmaking.<br />

Corner joints in frames may utilize<br />

mortise and tenon joints that may incorporate<br />

one mitred side or pegs, lap joints that sometimes<br />

have a mitred side, and simple mitres<br />

that may be reinforced with wooden splines<br />

cut into the corner or a wooden wedge at the<br />

back. Frames were usually integral to panel<br />

paintings until toward the middle of the<br />

fifteenth century, when the two forms were<br />

separated (Newberry et al., 1990). Most mirror<br />

and picture frames utilize wood as a substrate.<br />

The decorative materials and techniques used<br />

to enhance them are similar to those found on<br />

furniture. The conservation problems that<br />

apply to frames are often analogous to those in<br />

the broader discipline of furniture conservation.<br />

Frames were usually made to enhance the<br />

presentation of a specific work of art, and often<br />

also functioned as an architectural element<br />

within the broader context of an interior<br />

Principles of conserving and repairing wooden furniture 459<br />

design. This symbiosis may be an important<br />

consideration for evaluating the degree of<br />

treatment necessary for the conservation of a<br />

framed painting or mirror. In the case where a<br />

painting or mirror and its frame are both to be<br />

treated, the aesthetic balance between them<br />

should be maintained. From the third quarter<br />

of the eighteenth century and onward, composition<br />

became a popular material for the<br />

surface decoration of gilded frames (see<br />

section 10.5.7). An introduction to the history<br />

and stylistic development of frames may be<br />

found in Jacob (1996), Newberry et al. (1990)<br />

and van Thiel and de Bruyn Kops (1995).<br />

Mendgen (1995) examines nineteenth and<br />

early twentieth century frames whilst Baldi et<br />

al. (1992) offer excellent illustrations, including<br />

profiles, and an introduction to the restoration<br />

of frames.<br />

Handling mirror frames<br />

Structural factors and the condition of surface<br />

decoration should be considered before<br />

handling and moving mirror frames. Handling<br />

carved mirror frames may be problematic<br />

because there are often few, if any, handling<br />

points that do not involve applying pressure to<br />

fragile elements of the frame. The frame itself<br />

may not be structurally sound as a result of<br />

adhesive failure due to excessively low, high or<br />

fluctuating RH, insect infestation and minimal<br />

fixings that may have corroded. In addition,<br />

mirrors may contain multiple sheets of glass<br />

that are often not securely fixed to the frame.<br />

There is a danger of catastrophic failure if a<br />

mirror is moved, particularly as it is moved<br />

from a vertical to horizontal plane. Mirror<br />

plates are sometimes held in place with glue<br />

blocks, which may also be pinned. The glass<br />

may break if it shifts and comes into contact<br />

with these pins. The frame should not be relied<br />

on to hold the weight of the mirror if it is<br />

placed face down. Thus a frame should not be<br />

moved from a vertical to a horizontal position<br />

without taking into consideration the construction<br />

and stability of the frame, the change of<br />

weight distribution and pressure points, movement<br />

of panes and the way in which they have<br />

been secured. It may be necessary to provide<br />

support for glass and fragile decorative<br />

elements on the frame. Dowling (1999)<br />

describes a system for the removal and installation<br />

of mirrors, which ensures they are kept

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!